That's not really the case, especially not here. The individual components are recognizable, but without knowing why it is designed the way it is, it's impossible for me to guess as to why you'd connect them in such a way. In any case, knowing it is essentially an attempt at a differentiable NARS-like system helps.
On Sun, Dec 15, 2024, 2:26 PM YKY (Yan King Yin, 甄景贤) < generic.intellige...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 3:02 AM mm ee <csmicahelli...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I am trying to understand, given the post is very vague. 1) What is this >> supposed to do differently from what we have today, 2) have you tried it? >> What new problems did it solve?, and 3) what resources would one need to >> run it themselves? I'm not looking for detailed architectural explanations, >> but I feel like I'm looking at a Rube Goldberg machine. >> > > Dude, if you understand traditional logic-based AI you would be able to > grasp the diagram instantly > (except some details) perhaps with a smile on your face, as those things > would look so familiar. > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + > delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> > Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T8685950780e86bd5-M3e3ff6dfbf8a300e5bb9cbbd> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T8685950780e86bd5-Md3ddbf38c68fff285b03fe10 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
