Do you really think robots are going to pay into SSI?
On 3/21/25 14:24, Darin Steffl wrote:
Do we think when Tesla Optimus robots are mass produced in a few
years, that some of the manual labor can be replaced with robots? That
would drive down fiber construction cost considerably. Instead of 5
guys per drill crew, it could be 1-2 guys and the rest are robots.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2025, 3:50 PM dbernardi <dberna...@zitomedia.net> wrote:
But the expensive/important part (fiber) is in place. If the
gubment is
going to piss away tax dollars for unserved/underserved broadband,
fiber
construction seems like a decent urinal.
XGS-PON can co-exist with GPON on the same fiber so eventual upgrades
are fairly easy. Do combo GPON/XGS-PON at the OLT out of the gate
so a
CPE swap is the only thing require for an upgrade to a shared 10Gb
service. When XGS-PON isn't enough bandwidth for the 32
subscribers on
a PON, I'd rather replace equipment at either end than deal with
another
construction project. Or do a 1:16 split.
Preparing for AE when doing the construction is probably
worthwhile too
even if you only light for PON initially, or mix/match. The cost of
deploying high count fiber cable isn't that significant in the big
picture.
And why does fiber construction have to be so (artificially?)
expensive.
Buy America will certainly make broadband deployments more
expensive
but that's a good thing if it truly provides jobs and manufacturing
investment, but I have my doubts.
On 3/21/2025 2:04 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
> Is GPON good enough? That can only do gigabit and each port is
2.5G.
> Should these projects require NGPON? Or maybe every location
should
> have AE so they can do 100G to start with.
>
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 2:01 PM Steve Jones
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com
> <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Because in X years they won't be. With fiber they will be
upon the
> same Infrastructure.
>
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2025, 10:59 AM Josh Luthman
> <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>>
> wrote:
>
> But people that currently have fixed wireless of 100x20 are
> sufficiently served? How does that make any sense?
>
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 11:44 AM Steve Jones
> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com
<mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> they should not allow fixed wireless, they never
should have
> allowed technology with a short shelf life
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 9:17 AM Adam Moffett
> <dmmoff...@gmail.com <mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
>
> Well....
>
> https://bsky.app/profile/craigsilverman.bsky.social/
> post/3lkiye5n2dk2p <https://bsky.app/profile/
> craigsilverman.bsky.social/post/3lkiye5n2dk2p>
>
> https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/s/seq3uoU1L5
> <https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/s/seq3uoU1L5>
>
> The director of BEAD quit. He says the previous
rules
> interpreted the bill to mean that only FTTH
would meet
> the performance and future-proofing
requirements. He is
> claiming that there are proposed rule changes
that will
> allow Starlink but not allow fixed wireless. I
don't
> know whether the changes /intentionally/ benefit
> Starlink, but this guy is crying foul and felt
strongly
> enough about it to resign over it.
>
> -Adam
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* AF on behalf of Ken Hohhof
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 20, 2025 12:19 AM
> *To:* 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group'
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] BEAD
>
> I’m surprised BEAD hasn’t run into problems
because the
> E stands for Equity and DEI is now banned.
>
> But if they eliminate the E, would it just be BAD?
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
<http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com <http://
> af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
<http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com <http://
> af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
<http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>>
>
>
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com