That's why context is so important. "Practitioner" is pretty subjective,
as is "meds". What if the meds were LSD, methamphetamine, psilocybin,
morphine? What if the practitioner were RFK Jr?
Analogy is weak.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 12/10/2024 9:17 AM, ch...@go-mtc.com wrote:
Does this idea work:
Say the school observes/detects a certain trait in your kid. The kid
seemingly agrees with the people at the school. They think that if
they can get the kid treatment, the kid will be much happier and relaxed.
So they pursue some counseling for the kid and help the kid obtain
some treatment meds from a practitioner.
All without the knowledge of the parents.
Seemingly the kid is happier and more well adjusted. They become
gregarious and outgoing and find it easier to find friends.
Nobody seems to tell the kid or be worried about the long term
physical and mental effects.
Some folks in this nation think this is totally OK.
All for the kid right.
Now, a few details I left out:
The teacher thinks the kid might be an alcoholic. There is some
science that hints that alcholism is genetic. The school thinks that
it might be helpful for the kid to explore the world of alcohol. They
give the kid some books on mixology etc. So they set up a kid bar
with a bar tender to give them their meds during the day. Spectacular
results right.
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
