It's kind of like selling you a Toyota, but you have to take a Kia, and Yugo with it.

bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

On 9/22/2024 5:38 PM, Jan-GAMs wrote:

I would like to see some plate cleaning especially in the video-streaming whackos.  There's a bunch of shows I used to love to watch and can't because some other service sucked it up.  I'm real sick of being charged for shit I'll never watch too.  Comcast charges for fox and espn even if you don't subscribe for it.  Do you think that's criminal behavior?  It kind of sounds like double-billing, already paying for but have to add it to the video package and pay more just to watch?.  Hey in our rural area we have 4 fiber/cable companies: zipply, spectrum, beacon, DFN plus a wisp.

On 9/22/24 15:21, Ken Hohhof wrote:

I just got this in my Facebook feed, the link takes you to here:

https://watchcomm.net/flash-sale/

*From:*AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones
*Sent:* Saturday, September 21, 2024 11:43 PM
*To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] race to the bottom?

theyre offering 350 dollar invoice credit to new customers, they could resell tmobile and clean others plates when they have all that government money

On Sat, Sep 21, 2024 at 10:53 PM Ken Hohhof <khoh...@kwom.com> wrote:

    I guess it helps to have both government money and private equity
    money.

    Watch has me confused, they originally announced they were
    deploying Ericsson equipment, but then said their CAF deployments
    in the Midwest would use Tarana G1. They show all these circles
    of licensed availability on the national broadband map but I
    can’t find any Tarana gear on towers by us.  Are they waiting for
    Tarana G2?  Are they deploying the Ericsson stuff?  Could they be
    doing some joint deployment with DISH?  The only Watch stuff I’ve
    seen are their pretty new trucks.  In the pretty truck
    department, they’re eating my lunch.

    They must be using some licensed spectrum other than CBRS because
    they have no PALs in some counties where they claim licensed (not
    LBR) and even if they were leasing someone else’s PALs the SAS is
    not blocking any of those channels out for me.

    *From:*AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones
    *Sent:* Saturday, September 21, 2024 10:08 PM
    *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] race to the bottom?

    the party is over ken.

    FWA coffin nails are enroute. the likes of nextlink and watch are
    going to push pretty much every FWA only operator out of the
    market. Those with a sufficient fiber base may be able to
    supplement their FWA service with that revenue, but over time the
    lube just wont stroke the meat anymore.

    And then Nexlink and Watch will jack those rates up

    On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 9:01 AM Ken Hohhof <khoh...@kwom.com> wrote:

        I’m noticing some trends with the numbers for FWA that I
        can’t make sense out of.

        - monthly price is expected to be $30 to $50

        - speed is expected to be 100M to 1G

        - equipment cost is around $1000 per sub for AP+CPE (if you
        have at least 50-100 subs per tower)

        - include a free router or mesh system

        - throw in freebies like streaming, gift cards, reimburse
        cancellation fees, etc.

        I understand with fiber you probably have high take rate and
        low churn, and eventually make that investment back.  But
        with FWA, it seems like there will always be churn, and
        expensive CPE either not returned or having to be refurbished
        and reinstalled.  New owner might instead go with 5G home
        Internet or Starlink or another WISP (people have lots of
        choices), or BEAD subsidized fiber and now you’ve probably
        lost that location permanently (unless you’re the one putting
        in the fiber).

        So is this a race to the bottom with other people’s money? 
        Or am I missing other revenue sources like ads, harvesting
        and selling data, bundled services?

        I get the same feeling as the early days of streaming when
        everybody was losing money to get market share, until the
        reckoning when they tried to turn a profit.  It also seemed
        that way in the 5G home Internet world with T-Mobile and
        Verizon offering promo pricing, then raising prices, but now
        they’re back to $30 and $50 prices.

-- AF mailing list
        AF@af.afmug.com
        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- AF mailing list
    AF@af.afmug.com
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to