What's caused the damage in your experiences?  Random failures or big
yellow cats?

On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 3:58 PM <ch...@go-mtc.com> wrote:

> When you are out in the desert tracking direct bury fiber, only handholes
> are splice points.... good luck.
> If the closest hand hole is 2 miles away from the area of the fault, good
> luck.  You will wheel it off, read the sequential, then wheel it off again,
> dig again.  Not find the damage.  Then you have the choice to cut and shoot
> it again or just start exposing cable.  Flip a coin to choose which way to
> start digging and start digging.  Have dug for hundreds of feed looking for
> damage and sometimes it is very hard to see.  Sometimes a gopher will just
> eat into the side of a cable a little bit.
>
> You can strip it and have someone put a visible light on it if  you are
> not too far away for that to work.  That can tell you if you are on the CO
> side of the fault.  There are also those bendy fiber detectors that can
> help with that too.  Hopefully you find it close enough that you can put a
> handhole near where  you stripped it.  Always takes two handholes or peds
> to fix.  And LOTS of digging.
>
>
> *From:* castarritt
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 28, 2024 1:49 PM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables
>
> Shouldn't you be able to look at the distance to fault from the last
> splice, look up the cable footage marker going into that splice closure (go
> check it if you didn't document that when it was built), check footage
> marker at closest handhole, and then wheel it off from there?
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 2:42 PM <ch...@go-mtc.com> wrote:
>
>> So on a 15 mile shot with a problem somewhere in the middle, you think
>> you can wheel it off and dig it up and find it?
>> One shot, from the end.  Walk right to the problem?
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Josh Luthman
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 28, 2024 1:07 PM
>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables
>>
>> That hasn't been my experience, but at the same time we're not 25 mile
>> shots - it's maybe 15 max.
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 11:43 AM <ch...@go-mtc.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I also use EXFOs and they will read to the meter, but if you have a
>>> fiber cut out 25 miles, I will bet good money that when you dig up the spot
>>> where your OTDR says the fault is, you will be off by 100 feet or more if
>>> you did not do a test from the nearest splice point.  In reality it will be
>>> off by thousands of feet.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Chuck McCown
>>>
>>> McCown Technology Corporation
>>> 8401 N Commerce Dr
>>> Lake Point, Utah 84074
>>> 801-250-9503 Office
>>> 435-830-4306 Cell
>>> www.mccowntech.com
>>> www.microtrench.pro
>>> www.terabitnetworks.com
>>>
>>> *From:* Ryan Ray
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 27, 2024 9:58 PM
>>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables
>>>
>>> We use EXFO otdr's on some spans that are 160km and we can get it down
>>> to the metre.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 7:07 PM Josh Luthman <
>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Don't you document where your splices are?  If you see your splices
>>>> every 33k and see it's broken 1 mile from the last splice it should be
>>>> pretty obvious, no?
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 6:26 PM <ch...@go-mtc.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Magical device called a fusion splicer.  Our reels were typically
>>>>> 33,000’
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Josh Luthman
>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 27, 2024 3:51 PM
>>>>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't see how you have a 50 mile span.  Even if you get 80k reels
>>>>> that's 15 miles.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 5:19 PM <ch...@go-mtc.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> When you have spans up to 50-75 miles at times, you have to use
>>>>>> longer high power pulses.  There is a lot of variability in velocity of
>>>>>> propagation, earth temperature, splice slack loops, fiber twist.  1 mile
>>>>>> error over 50 miles is only 2%.  You can easily be off by several 
>>>>>> thousand
>>>>>> feet.  You can’t just go dig.  You have to go to the closest splice point
>>>>>> and test again, even then if you it show the fault 2000 feet away and you
>>>>>> dig at 2000 feet you may be off by 20 feet or more.  I have been doing 
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> for decades.  Takes lots of digging to actually find it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From:* Josh Luthman
>>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 27, 2024 3:01 PM
>>>>>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A mile?!  IDK how that's possible.  Every time we turn a new splitter
>>>>>> on the sequentials and OTDR are within a few feet - we lose a couple of
>>>>>> feet in butt splices and our sequentials end up wrong.  Every new reel 
>>>>>> gets
>>>>>> tested on delivery and it's right on.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When we had a broken fiber (ants) it was right on the case.  When we
>>>>>> had a broken fiber (ribbon got knicked with installation) it was between
>>>>>> two cases.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 3:48 PM <ch...@go-mtc.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wow, sometimes looking for gopher damager over 20 miles I have been
>>>>>>> off a mile.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *From:* Josh Luthman
>>>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 27, 2024 1:30 PM
>>>>>>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So far every time we've used the OTDR it's been accurate within 1
>>>>>>> foot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 12:55 PM Trey Scarborough <t...@3dsc.co>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The only thing you have to worry about with shorter cables is the
>>>>>>>> reflection. In some instances with dirty connector at just the right
>>>>>>>> connector you can get reflection back in to the transmitter that can 
>>>>>>>> cause
>>>>>>>> errors, the tx to shut down or premature failure. This is very uncommon
>>>>>>>> with LR 10G and less optics and can be prevented from making sure you 
>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>> clean connectors. Check the RX and TX levels and make sure you don't 
>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>> excessive loss. With 100G its a little different story due to the 
>>>>>>>> combined
>>>>>>>> power of multiple channels, but still can be prevented by cleaning
>>>>>>>> connectors, but in some instances Ive had to use attenuation when 
>>>>>>>> mixing
>>>>>>>> different vendor optics.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The using no launch on an OTDR most automatically calibrating OTDRs
>>>>>>>> will work without one. Your results can be off though. Most of the 
>>>>>>>> lower
>>>>>>>> cost ones are also lower powered and have less of an RX sensitivity so 
>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>> don't suffer as much from the reflections interfering when testing. I 
>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>> test all day long with my little otdrs without one, but my long range 
>>>>>>>> 200k+
>>>>>>>> units I have to have a minimum of a 1k spool on it or you see ghosts. 
>>>>>>>> They
>>>>>>>> will show up as repeating events at even intervals. Not something you 
>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>> see on shorter runs either.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 8/26/24 4:31 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I should note that apparently I used to do this with direct attach
>>>>>>>> cables (DAC) but I think that was a pain, one more thing to stock and 
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> bring with for projects.  Whereas I’d always have boxes full of SFPs 
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> fiber patch cords.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *From:* AF mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com *On Behalf Of *Josh
>>>>>>>> Luthman
>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, August 26, 2024 4:20 PM
>>>>>>>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group mailto:af@af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> People say you need a launch cable but our cheap china OTDRs have
>>>>>>>> no issues seeing the connector at the end of the patch cable and stuff
>>>>>>>> beyond.  I bought a big launch cable back in the day and never use it
>>>>>>>> anymore.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Might be different with AE?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 5:16 PM <ch...@go-mtc.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Only minimum length I know of is the OTDR dead zone.  If that is a
>>>>>>>> problem you purposely lengthen the cable with a launch cable.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *From:* Josh Luthman
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, August 26, 2024 1:59 PM
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] fiber patch cables
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Reddit is wrong.  Gasp.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Connectors are loss, there is more loss in either one of the
>>>>>>>> connectors than there is the single mode glass.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Between a switch/router in a rack what I see all the time is long
>>>>>>>> (like 5/10/15 feet) cables and then put the slack in a loop along the 
>>>>>>>> posts.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 1:19 PM TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Patchbox makes some great products, their fiber system is pretty
>>>>>>>> slick but expensive.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cable length is irrelevant it's optical budget / Rx signal
>>>>>>>> strength. Normally on 2-20k LR optics you are ok with any length cable,
>>>>>>>> 40km+ needs a pad on short spans. (Attenuator)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2024, 8:29 AM Ken Hohhof <khoh...@kwom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is there a minimum length for a single mode fiber patch cable?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have been using 1 meter cables and they are almost always too
>>>>>>>> long, I’m talking about going between routers and switches in a rack, 
>>>>>>>> stuff
>>>>>>>> like that.  I see that FS sells 0.5 meter cables, but I saw somewhere 
>>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>> maybe on Reddit someone claiming there was a minimum length.  Given SM
>>>>>>>> fiber and LR optics, I don’t see how 0.5 or 1.0 meter would be 
>>>>>>>> different
>>>>>>>> they are both essentially zero length.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Probably there’s some kind of cable tray or cable management
>>>>>>>> solution I could be using but I’ve never liked such things.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> --
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>> --
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>> ------------------------------
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
> ------------------------------
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to