After escalating with the provider, they think that might be what is
happening. If what they're telling me is true, Their Core network is
running MPLS, but it's in a QinQ to the NID that I'm plugged into. So
all IPv4 is fine, but might not pass IPv6.
So do I need to set anything special on my CRS317 bridge to pass the
IPv6 Traffic on the Vlans? The Only Ethertype setting I see in the
bridge interface itself, and you can only choose 0x8100, 0x88a8, or 0x9100
On 2/15/2021 10:12 AM, Jesse DuPont wrote:
It is possible your P2P provider is filtering Ethertypes. IPv4's
Ethertype if 0x0800 whereas IPv6's Ethertype is 0x86dd. This field is
right after the 802.1Q VLAN header in the L2 header.
*Jesse DuPont*
Owner / Network Architect
email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
Celerity Networks LLC / Celerity Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
On 2/15/21 7:36 AM, Nate Burke wrote:
I don't 'think' it's an MTU issue, even a simple IPv6 ping won't go
across the P2P circuit.
On the CRS317, if I torch Vlan3000 on the ccr1009 interface, I see
the IPv6 icmp packets coming in from my CCR1009, but if I torch the
Interface going to the P2P circuit on the CRS317, I see no IPv6
traffic. Is that a problem, or because of the way the Mikrotik
packet flows work, I would only see traffic as it enters the router,
and since there is no reply from the far end, nothing would show up.
On 2/15/2021 6:15 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
I don't think MTU would be the issue. If the endpoint has a 1500
byte MTU then it will send IP packets up to 1500 bytes long. IPv6
header is a little longer, but that means the data portion will just
have to be a little shorter. So if you had an MTU issue with v6
you'd have an MTU issue with v4 also.
On 2/14/2021 5:27 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
The ip6 traffic is encapsulated in the vlan? Ip6 headers I'm
assuming are larger because the number itself is longer, mtu. But
I'm just now learning to use vlans and I lick the tasty windows so
I dont know a lot
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021, 3:00 PM Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com
<mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Unless you've defined it as a protocol based VLAN then no it
shouldn't
matter.
On 2/14/2021 3:12 PM, Nate Burke wrote:
> I have a P2P circuit plugged into a CRS317-1G-16S+ and setting
> PVID3000 on that bridge interface. A Mikrotik CCR1009 is
plugged
> into another port on the CRS317 set for trunked VLan3000. I
can move
> IPv4 traffic on Vlan3000 and to the other end of the P2P
circuit just
> fine, but I cannot move any IPv6 traffic on Vlan3000.
>
> The Vlan shouldn't care about IP4 vs IP6 traffic, right? I
just want
> to make sure I'm not causing my own problem before pointing
my finger
> at the Circuit.
>
> The IPv6 package is not installed on the CRS317, because it's
just
> acting as a switch, it's not doing any routing. That shouldn't
> matter, right?
>
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
