I'm feeling a little better now that it's not me, I removed the uplink port on the CRS317 to the P2P from the bridge, and put the IPv6 address directly on that port, I still could not ping the other end. So that should have removed all the switch/vlan options and it would have just been a bare router port.

On 2/19/2021 12:06 AM, Steve Jones wrote:
Hell if I know. I have my first set of CRS coming in. I dont know how much different switchos is than ROS. But historically, task specific software is always better. I'm just hoping wireless isnt on in every package.

On Thu, Feb 18, 2021, 11:57 PM Nate Burke <n...@blastcomm.com <mailto:n...@blastcomm.com>> wrote:

    Router OS.  Just because I know it better.  In theory with the
    Hardware offloading, it should be the same, right?

    On 2/18/2021 9:30 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
    Are you running router OS or switch OS on the switch?

    On Thu, Feb 18, 2021, 9:06 PM Nate Burke <n...@blastcomm.com
    <mailto:n...@blastcomm.com>> wrote:

        ROS 6.47.7

        It's a production switch, so I'll have to change it around
        during a maintenance window.  The switch is passing several
        vlans between different ports, but this is the first IPv6
        traffic I'm putting through it.

        On 2/18/2021 8:22 PM, Jesse DuPont wrote:
        What RouterOS version is on your CRS317? In your third
        scenario, what happens if you turn off VLAN filtering in the
        Bridge's VLAN tab?
        

        *Jesse DuPont*

        Owner / Network Architect
        email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
        <mailto:jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net>
        Celerity Networks LLC / Celerity Broadband LLC
        Like us! facebook.com/ <http://facebook.com/>celeritynetworksllc

        Like us! facebook.com/ <http://facebook.com/>celeritybroadband

        On 2/18/21 6:55 PM, Nate Burke wrote:
        The P2P provider is saying that they find no technical
        reason why the IPv6 traffic is not passing, and they're
        pointing to my equipment.

        I've plugged a couple more routers into the CRS317 to test
        with.  What I found is that if I have the PVID set to the
        Vlan, and Admit all packets on the interface, then I can
        ping with IPv6 between the 2 routers.  But if I define a
        VLan on either router, no IPv6 traffic passes.

        Router1 <- Ethernet Cable -> Router2  Ipv6 works

        Router1 <-CRS317 port1 PVID=3000 <-> CRS317 Port2 PVID=3000
        -> Router2  IPv6 works

        Router1 <-CRS317 Port1 PVID=3000 <-> CRS317 Port2 ->
        Vlan3000 Router 2  IPv6 fails.

        But even if I have the PVID of my P2P port and Router1 set
        the same, I still can't ping an IPv6 address on the other
        end of the P2P circuit. I'm about ready to give up and Kill
        my Dualstack.

        Has anyone tried IPv6 with Vlans on a CRS317? Am I missing
        something simple?

        On 2/15/2021 11:34 AM, Jesse Dupont wrote:
        The CRS will pass all ethertypes by default.

        Sent from my iPhone

        On Feb 15, 2021, at 9:52 AM, Nate Burke
        <n...@blastcomm.com> <mailto:n...@blastcomm.com> wrote:

         After escalating with the provider, they think that
        might be what is happening.  If what they're telling me
        is true, Their Core network is running MPLS, but it's in
        a QinQ to the NID that I'm plugged into.  So all IPv4 is
        fine, but might not pass IPv6.

        So do I need to set anything special on my CRS317 bridge
        to pass the IPv6 Traffic on the Vlans?   The Only
        Ethertype setting I see in the bridge interface itself,
        and you can only choose 0x8100, 0x88a8, or 0x9100

        On 2/15/2021 10:12 AM, Jesse DuPont wrote:
        It is possible your P2P provider is filtering
        Ethertypes. IPv4's Ethertype if 0x0800 whereas IPv6's
        Ethertype is 0x86dd. This field is right after the
        802.1Q VLAN header in the L2 header.
        

        *Jesse DuPont*

        Owner / Network Architect
        email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
        <mailto:jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net>
        Celerity Networks LLC / Celerity Broadband LLC
        Like us! facebook.com/
        <http://facebook.com/>celeritynetworksllc

        Like us! facebook.com/
        <http://facebook.com/>celeritybroadband

        On 2/15/21 7:36 AM, Nate Burke wrote:
        I don't 'think' it's an MTU issue, even a simple IPv6
        ping won't go across the P2P circuit.

        On the CRS317, if I torch Vlan3000 on the ccr1009
        interface, I see the IPv6 icmp packets coming in from
        my CCR1009,  but if I torch the Interface going to the
        P2P circuit on the CRS317, I see no IPv6 traffic.  Is
        that a problem, or because of the way the Mikrotik
        packet flows work, I would only see traffic as it
        enters the router, and since there is no reply from the
        far end, nothing would show up.

        On 2/15/2021 6:15 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:

        I don't think MTU would be the issue.  If the endpoint
        has a 1500 byte MTU then it will send IP packets up to
        1500 bytes long. IPv6 header is a little longer, but
        that means the data portion will just have to be a
        little shorter.  So if you had an MTU issue with v6
        you'd have an MTU issue with v4 also.


        On 2/14/2021 5:27 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
        The ip6 traffic is encapsulated in the vlan? Ip6
        headers I'm assuming are larger because the number
        itself is longer, mtu. But I'm just now learning to
        use vlans and I lick the tasty windows so I dont know
        a lot

        On Sun, Feb 14, 2021, 3:00 PM Adam Moffett
        <dmmoff...@gmail.com <mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com>> wrote:

            Unless you've defined it as a protocol based VLAN
            then no it shouldn't
            matter.


            On 2/14/2021 3:12 PM, Nate Burke wrote:
            > I have a P2P circuit plugged into a
            CRS317-1G-16S+ and setting
            > PVID3000 on that bridge interface.  A Mikrotik
            CCR1009  is plugged
            > into another port on the CRS317 set for trunked
            VLan3000.  I can move
            > IPv4 traffic on Vlan3000 and to the other end
            of the P2P circuit just
            > fine, but I cannot move any IPv6 traffic on
            Vlan3000.
            >
            > The Vlan shouldn't care about IP4 vs IP6
            traffic, right?  I just want
            > to make sure I'm not causing my own problem
            before pointing my finger
            > at the Circuit.
            >
            > The IPv6 package is not installed on the
            CRS317, because it's just
            > acting as a switch, it's not doing any
            routing.  That shouldn't
            > matter, right?
            >

-- AF mailing list
            AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
            http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com








-- AF mailing list
        AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com






-- AF mailing list
        AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com




-- AF mailing list
    AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com




-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to