It is possible your P2P provider is filtering Ethertypes. IPv4's Ethertype if 0x0800 whereas IPv6's Ethertype is 0x86dd. This field is right after the 802.1Q VLAN header in the L2 header.


Jesse DuPont

Owner / Network Architect
email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
Celerity Networks LLC / Celerity Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc

Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband

 

On 2/15/21 7:36 AM, Nate Burke wrote:
I don't 'think' it's an MTU issue, even a simple IPv6 ping won't go across the P2P circuit. 

On the CRS317, if I torch Vlan3000 on the ccr1009 interface, I see the IPv6 icmp packets coming in from my CCR1009,  but if I torch the Interface going to the P2P circuit on the CRS317, I see no IPv6 traffic.  Is that a problem, or because of the way the Mikrotik packet flows work, I would only see traffic as it enters the router, and since there is no reply from the far end, nothing would show up. 

On 2/15/2021 6:15 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:

I don't think MTU would be the issue.  If the endpoint has a 1500 byte MTU then it will send IP packets up to 1500 bytes long.  IPv6 header is a little longer, but that means the data portion will just have to be a little shorter.  So if you had an MTU issue with v6 you'd have an MTU issue with v4 also.


On 2/14/2021 5:27 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
The ip6 traffic is encapsulated in the vlan? Ip6 headers I'm assuming are larger because the number itself is longer, mtu. But I'm just now learning to use vlans and I lick the tasty windows so I dont know a lot

On Sun, Feb 14, 2021, 3:00 PM Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
Unless you've defined it as a protocol based VLAN then no it shouldn't
matter.


On 2/14/2021 3:12 PM, Nate Burke wrote:
> I have a P2P circuit plugged into a CRS317-1G-16S+ and setting
> PVID3000 on that bridge interface.  A Mikrotik CCR1009  is plugged
> into another port on the CRS317 set for trunked VLan3000.  I can move
> IPv4 traffic on Vlan3000 and to the other end of the P2P circuit just
> fine, but I cannot move any IPv6 traffic on Vlan3000.
>
> The Vlan shouldn't care about IP4 vs IP6 traffic, right?  I just want
> to make sure I'm not causing my own problem before pointing my finger
> at the Circuit.
>
> The IPv6 package is not installed on the CRS317, because it's just
> acting as a switch, it's not doing any routing.  That shouldn't
> matter, right?
>

--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com






-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to