No, that statement actually says the word without need to infer. Integrates

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020, 8:24 PM Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote:

> You stated:
> “as long as your house doesnt integrate into multiple facets of society,
> including government thats 100% true”
>
> That Statement infers a large house.
>
> Where’s the line in the sand?
>
> If my social media platform integrates into some facets of society, but
> not all, including some government, but not all, is that ok?
>
> Just curious
>
> -Sean
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 7:15 PM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> who said anything about the size of the house
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 8:13 PM Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
>>
>>> Why should the size of the house matter?  It’s my house, I built it with
>>> my money.  You are free to build your own house or hang out at someone
>>> else’s house.
>>>
>>>
>>> In fact here on good ole animal farm we have lent and we can’t just say
>>> whatever we want...this is chuck’s house and we all abide by his rules.
>>>
>>> Sean
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 6:40 PM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> as long as your house doesnt integrate into multiple facets of society,
>>>> including government thats 100% true
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 6:56 PM Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> You can always use gab.com the twitter alternative that champions
>>>>> free speech on their platform.
>>>>>
>>>>> Honestly if I build a house and invite you to come over for free to
>>>>> hang out and you start saying things I don’t like while inside my house I
>>>>> should be and I am entitled to kick you out of my house or make you shut 
>>>>> up
>>>>> etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> now replace house with “social media platform”
>>>>>
>>>>> -Sean
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 10:15 AM Steve Jones <
>>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> yep, and your message can be removed in an instant if it does not
>>>>>> comply with the narrative
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:06 AM <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not really.  Today you can get your message out to the world with a
>>>>>>> tweet.
>>>>>>> How would you have been able to do that 100 years ago?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *From:* Steven Kenney
>>>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 28, 2020 9:54 AM
>>>>>>> *To:* af
>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT still a bit of hope and optimism
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I sense overwhelming sarcasm.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Steven Kenney
>>>>>>> Network Operations Manager
>>>>>>> WaveDirect Telecommunications
>>>>>>> http://www.wavedirect.net
>>>>>>> (519)737-WAVE (9283)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>> *From: *"chuck" <ch...@wbmfg.com>
>>>>>>> *To: *"af" <af@af.afmug.com>
>>>>>>> *Sent: *Tuesday, April 28, 2020 8:14:10 AM
>>>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] OT still a bit of hope and optimism
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 100 years ago it was newspapers and they only printed what they
>>>>>>> wanted you to hear.  Things are much better now.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Apr 28, 2020, at 2:49 AM, Jason McKemie <
>>>>>>> j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's a problem when the main conduits for communication are all
>>>>>>> private corporations though, especially in situations like this.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tuesday, April 28, 2020, Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Most people don’t realize that the constitutional protection of
>>>>>>>> free speech protects the government from stifling speech...private 
>>>>>>>> citizens
>>>>>>>> and corporations are not required to protect anyone’s speech.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Not saying I agree or disagree with it, just stating what the
>>>>>>>> constitution says.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> YMMV
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Sean
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 11:19 PM Jason McKemie <
>>>>>>>> j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Being "not evil" I guess. Another copy has been put up, but the
>>>>>>>>> stifling of free speech is a bit alarming. They do this all of the 
>>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>> with things the left deems inappropriate. I'm pretty much centrist, 
>>>>>>>>> but the
>>>>>>>>> fringe at both sides is absolutely abhorrent, I'll go back to 
>>>>>>>>> adhering to
>>>>>>>>> lent now.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, April 28, 2020, Robert <i...@avantwireless.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Whoa, google took it down?  That's amazing.   I wonder what the
>>>>>>>>>> process that resulted in that was?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 4/27/20 8:01 PM, Jason McKemie wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'll watch it again, but it's a bit difficult now since Google
>>>>>>>>>> took it down. Doesn't help the case that they feel like they need to 
>>>>>>>>>> cover
>>>>>>>>>> it up as opposed to just tearing it apart if it is so wrong.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, April 27, 2020, Robert <i...@avantwireless.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's was pitched that way but you look at what they are doing
>>>>>>>>>>> with the "numbers" is totally fictitious...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/27/20 7:01 PM, Jason McKemie wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If we're thinking of the same video I thought it was pretty
>>>>>>>>>>> refreshing, and the overall gist of the thing seemed pretty sound 
>>>>>>>>>>> to me.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, April 27, 2020, Robert <i...@avantwireless.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep, speculation that a couple of doctors in Kern County CA
>>>>>>>>>>>> treated like science fact to back up their agenda...   Ethics in 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Medicine
>>>>>>>>>>>> is just about dead, put another nail in the coffin..
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/27/20 12:25 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Well... here we are one week later, and we just ticked over 1
>>>>>>>>>>>> million confirmed infections in the US. Let's hope that's the tip 
>>>>>>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>>>>>>> iceberg, and that the actual infections is in the neighborhood of 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 50-80
>>>>>>>>>>>> million. I don't believe the number is actually that high, but I 
>>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>>> believe something around 5-8 million. Either way, it is still just
>>>>>>>>>>>> speculation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> bp
>>>>>>>>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/20/2020 9:33 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the treatments that are now working?  I try to be
>>>>>>>>>>>> optimistic about antivirals and convalescent plasma, but right now 
>>>>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>>>> mainly have ventilators, which honestly aren’t very successful if 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 70-80% of
>>>>>>>>>>>> the people die.  They keep doing that because it’s the textbook 
>>>>>>>>>>>> therapy for
>>>>>>>>>>>> respiratory distress, but it ain’t working.  Even if it were 
>>>>>>>>>>>> working,
>>>>>>>>>>>> ventilators are not a treatment, they don’t reverse the disease, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> they are
>>>>>>>>>>>> just a measure to get you oxygen while your body hopefully fights 
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> infection.  And then you have the people experiencing kidney 
>>>>>>>>>>>> failure and
>>>>>>>>>>>> needing dialysis, they’re not sure if the damage is permanent.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I hope you’re right that the medical community has learned how
>>>>>>>>>>>> to treat it, but I haven’t heard the evidence for that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding a vaccine, one interesting piece of information I
>>>>>>>>>>>> read was that even if they develop a successful and safe vaccine 
>>>>>>>>>>>> (many
>>>>>>>>>>>> challenges including the sensitization problem), then they have to 
>>>>>>>>>>>> scale up
>>>>>>>>>>>> vaccine production.  Right now most vaccines are just for each new 
>>>>>>>>>>>> wave of
>>>>>>>>>>>> schoolchildren, this would have to be for the entire population.  
>>>>>>>>>>>> And not
>>>>>>>>>>>> in chicken eggs, it would have to be in big vats.  And the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> interesting part
>>>>>>>>>>>> is they could repurpose fermentation tanks used for things like 
>>>>>>>>>>>> brewing
>>>>>>>>>>>> beer.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* AF mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com *On Behalf Of *Bill
>>>>>>>>>>>> Prince
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, April 20, 2020 11:20 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* af@af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT still a bit of hope and optimism
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Time will tell based on whether it actually starts declining in
>>>>>>>>>>>> a meaningful way, or whether we're going to bump along for a bit. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Remember,
>>>>>>>>>>>> the goal was to flatten the curve; it wasn't necessarily going to 
>>>>>>>>>>>> reduce
>>>>>>>>>>>> the number of infections. I get the impression that the medical 
>>>>>>>>>>>> community
>>>>>>>>>>>> has learned a lot about how to actually treat it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's see where we are a week from today (April 27). If we are
>>>>>>>>>>>> over 1 million infections, this may be going a while yet. If it is 
>>>>>>>>>>>> under 1
>>>>>>>>>>>> million, I would be more encouraged.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> bp
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/20/2020 8:20 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Looks a bit Gaussian to me.  I hope...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <image001.png>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to