I was referring to newspapers printing what the public wants to hear. The exact 
opposite. They print what they want you to believe. 

-- 
Steven Kenney 
Network Operations Manager 
WaveDirect Telecommunications 
http://www.wavedirect.net 
(519)737-WAVE (9283) 


From: "chuck" <ch...@wbmfg.com> 
To: "af" <af@af.afmug.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 12:06:12 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT still a bit of hope and optimism 

Not really. Today you can get your message out to the world with a tweet. 
How would you have been able to do that 100 years ago? 
From: Steven Kenney 
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 9:54 AM 
To: af 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT still a bit of hope and optimism 
I sense overwhelming sarcasm. 
-- 
Steven Kenney 
Network Operations Manager 
WaveDirect Telecommunications 
http://www.wavedirect.net 
(519)737-WAVE (9283) 

From: "chuck" <ch...@wbmfg.com> 
To: "af" <af@af.afmug.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 8:14:10 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT still a bit of hope and optimism 
100 years ago it was newspapers and they only printed what they wanted you to 
hear. Things are much better now. 

Sent from my iPhone 



On Apr 28, 2020, at 2:49 AM, Jason McKemie <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> 
wrote: 





BQ_BEGIN

It's a problem when the main conduits for communication are all private 
corporations though, especially in situations like this. 

On Tuesday, April 28, 2020, Sean Heskett < af...@zirkel.us > wrote: 

BQ_BEGIN

Most people don’t realize that the constitutional protection of free speech 
protects the government from stifling speech...private citizens and 
corporations are not required to protect anyone’s speech. 
Not saying I agree or disagree with it, just stating what the constitution 
says. 
YMMV 
-Sean 
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 11:19 PM Jason McKemie < 
j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com > wrote: 

BQ_BEGIN
Being "not evil" I guess. Another copy has been put up, but the stifling of 
free speech is a bit alarming. They do this all of the time with things the 
left deems inappropriate. I'm pretty much centrist, but the fringe at both 
sides is absolutely abhorrent, I'll go back to adhering to lent now. 

On Tuesday, April 28, 2020, Robert < i...@avantwireless.com > wrote: 

BQ_BEGIN

Whoa, google took it down? That's amazing. I wonder what the process that 
resulted in that was? 

On 4/27/20 8:01 PM, Jason McKemie wrote: 

BQ_BEGIN
I'll watch it again, but it's a bit difficult now since Google took it down. 
Doesn't help the case that they feel like they need to cover it up as opposed 
to just tearing it apart if it is so wrong. 

On Monday, April 27, 2020, Robert < i...@avantwireless.com > wrote: 

BQ_BEGIN

It's was pitched that way but you look at what they are doing with the 
"numbers" is totally fictitious... 


On 4/27/20 7:01 PM, Jason McKemie wrote: 

BQ_BEGIN
If we're thinking of the same video I thought it was pretty refreshing, and the 
overall gist of the thing seemed pretty sound to me. 

On Monday, April 27, 2020, Robert < i...@avantwireless.com > wrote: 

BQ_BEGIN

Yep, speculation that a couple of doctors in Kern County CA treated like 
science fact to back up their agenda... Ethics in Medicine is just about dead, 
put another nail in the coffin.. 

On 4/27/20 12:25 PM, Bill Prince wrote: 

BQ_BEGIN


Well... here we are one week later, and we just ticked over 1 million confirmed 
infections in the US. Let's hope that's the tip of the iceberg, and that the 
actual infections is in the neighborhood of 50-80 million. I don't believe the 
number is actually that high, but I would believe something around 5-8 million. 
Either way, it is still just speculation. 



bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> 
On 4/20/2020 9:33 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote: 

BQ_BEGIN



What are the treatments that are now working? I try to be optimistic about 
antivirals and convalescent plasma, but right now they mainly have ventilators, 
which honestly aren’t very successful if 70-80% of the people die. They keep 
doing that because it’s the textbook therapy for respiratory distress, but it 
ain’t working. Even if it were working, ventilators are not a treatment, they 
don’t reverse the disease, they are just a measure to get you oxygen while your 
body hopefully fights the infection. And then you have the people experiencing 
kidney failure and needing dialysis, they’re not sure if the damage is 
permanent. 



I hope you’re right that the medical community has learned how to treat it, but 
I haven’t heard the evidence for that. 



Regarding a vaccine, one interesting piece of information I read was that even 
if they develop a successful and safe vaccine (many challenges including the 
sensitization problem), then they have to scale up vaccine production. Right 
now most vaccines are just for each new wave of schoolchildren, this would have 
to be for the entire population. And not in chicken eggs, it would have to be 
in big vats. And the interesting part is they could repurpose fermentation 
tanks used for things like brewing beer. 






From: AF mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com On Behalf Of Bill Prince 
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2020 11:20 AM 
To: af@af.afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT still a bit of hope and optimism 




Time will tell based on whether it actually starts declining in a meaningful 
way, or whether we're going to bump along for a bit. Remember, the goal was to 
flatten the curve; it wasn't necessarily going to reduce the number of 
infections. I get the impression that the medical community has learned a lot 
about how to actually treat it. 

Let's see where we are a week from today (April 27). If we are over 1 million 
infections, this may be going a while yet. If it is under 1 million, I would be 
more encouraged. 
bp 
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> 


On 4/20/2020 8:20 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: 

BQ_BEGIN



Looks a bit Gaussian to me. I hope... 






<image001.png> 





BQ_END



BQ_END


BQ_END


BQ_END


BQ_END


BQ_END


BQ_END


BQ_END
-- 
AF mailing list 
AF@af.afmug.com 
[ http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com | 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com ] 

BQ_END


BQ_END
-- 
AF mailing list 
AF@af.afmug.com 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 

BQ_END

-- 
AF mailing list 
AF@af.afmug.com 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 



-- 
AF mailing list 
AF@af.afmug.com 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 

-- 
AF mailing list 
AF@af.afmug.com 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to