Either way this goes, I'll be curious to see what the data in the US is after the fact. I feel both sides win either way.
If virus is contained: 1.Social distancing worked. 2. Social distancing wasn't necessary. If virus isn't contained: 1. We needed to social distance earlier. 2. Social distancing didn't matter. On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 11:37 AM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: > Do you get that with your Apple News+ subscription? > > > > *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *ch...@wbmfg.com > *Sent:* Saturday, March 28, 2020 10:22 AM > *To:* af@af.afmug.com > *Subject:* [AFMUG] OT Virus graphics > > > > This is an interesting article: > > > https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/2020/03/how-cities-flattened-curve-1918-spanish-flu-pandemic-coronavirus/ > > > > Note the double boom if you relax your social distancing after the initial > peak is over. > > Looks like 10-12 weeks of people dying. We are 2.5 weeks into that > cycle. > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
