We may see a few points I suspect but the result should be same or very close as we see on any of our pre cbrs units. Here is one thats about a mile thru some tree. This area I am giving results is not in any way flat. It has Hills cliffs lakes and many types of tree. I am still onboarding our network to cbrs and I have larger sites with 300+ subs at 6mile with similar or better numbers on the medusa including the ones in a far
enviroment. Lots have this performance on a 15Mhz wide channel.
 We estimate to see double this on our medusas when we move them to cbrs.

I have been fighting with the worst in terrain and tree imaginable since the canopy days and I feel like I have been able to overcome some serious challenges with our very rural area.

Oh, forgot to mention that heart Drs and surgeons build in the stix too LOL


   Link Test Configurations

Link Test Mode :        

Signal to Noise Ratio Calculation during Link Test :    
Enabled
Disabled
Link Test with All Available Data Channels :    
All Available Data Channels
Low Priority Channel only
Note: All Available Data Channels option requires that the SM already has at least one additional data channel enabled.


   Link Test Settings

Duration :      
Seconds (2 — 10)
Direction :     

Number of Packets :
(0 — 64) Zero will flood the link for duration of test
Packet Length :
Bytes (64 — 1714 bytes)


   Current Results Status

Stats for LUID: 63   Test Duration: 10   Pkt Length: 1714   Test Direction Bi-Directional

*Link Test without Bridging*
Data
Channel
Priority        Downlink        Uplink  Aggregate       Packet Transmit         
Packet Receive
Actual  Actual
Low 103.17 Mbps 21.94 Mbps 125.11 Mbps,  9054 pps 15893 (1589 pps) 74657 (7465 pps)



*Efficiency*
Downlink        Uplink
Efficiency      Fragments
count   Efficiency      Fragments
count
Actual  Missed  Actual  Missed
99%     2015121         75      99%     430607  1918


Link Test ran on 13:40:08 02/28/2020 UTC

*Currently transmitting at:*
8X/4X MIMO-B



Current Contention Mode Status: No Piggyback of data in contention


On 2/27/20 10:28 AM, Eric Muehleisen wrote:
Still in winter. I'd like to see how it performs when the leaves are full in May.

On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 9:26 AM dave <dmilho...@wletc.com <mailto:dmilho...@wletc.com>> wrote:

    We R starting to see some real world impressive results with just
    the pmp450i CBRS radios on a 20Mhz channels
    This guy is nearLOS about 2.5 miles of some tree and pointing into
    edge of panel


        Current Results Status

    Stats for LUID: 65   Test Duration: 10   Pkt Length: 1714   Test
    Direction Bi-Directional

    *Link Test without Bridging*
    Data
    Channel
    Priority    Downlink        Uplink  Aggregate       Packet Transmit         
Packet
    Receive
    Actual      Actual
    Low         50.01 Mbps      32.97 Mbps      82.98 Mbps,  6008 pps   23887 
(2388
    pps)        36207 (3620 pps)



    *Efficiency*
    Downlink    Uplink
    Efficiency  Fragments
    count       Efficiency      Fragments
    count
    Actual      Missed  Actual  Missed
    99%         984301  7409    99%     647582  3593


    Link Test ran on 15:20:50 02/27/2020 UTC

    *Currently transmitting at:*
    8X/6X MIMO-B



    Current Contention Mode Status: No Piggyback of data in contention

    On 2/25/20 3:59 PM, Matt Mangriotis via AF wrote:

    I completely understand your skepticism Ken. However, Cambium did
    design the 3 GHz 450m with every intention of being able to
    support a transition to LTE (specifically, as a RRH with
    cnRanger). The intent is for this device to be a fully capable
    8x8 MU-MIMO. Yes, you’ve got that right though, you’ll need new
    CPE devices and a BBU for each sector.

    We don’t have a target date when this will be developed yet…
    right now, we’re focused on getting the cnRanger CBRS 2x2 RRH and
    High Gain Cat 6 CPE devices out in August!

    With respect to NLOS coverage, I will agree that 450 is not quite
    on par with some of the things that LTE brings to the table
    (regarding range and the ability to maintain the downlink).
    However, with the increased power limits of CBRS, the 450m does
    an admirable job. In fact, in comparing equipment cost and
    performance, I would suggest that the 450 platform outperforms
    anything out there. That is, it’s less expensive to get bandwidth
    where it needs to be (at a higher rate, and to more customers).
    If the customer density can support the cost of cnMedusa, you’re
    going to be better off from total cost of ownership (both CapEx
    and OpEx) perspective.

    The new 3GHz 450b High Gain has 29 dBm Tx Pwr, and a 20 dBi dish
    integrated antenna… this is pretty impressive for CBRS CPE
    equipment (most of the high gain/high power LTE stuff I see is
    only going to be 23 dBm Tx, plus 15 dBi antenna).

    There are several customers out there that have done these
    comparisons… hopefully, they can chime in.

    Matt

    *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com>
    <mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of * Ken Hohhof
    *Sent:* Monday, February 24, 2020 7:06 PM
    *To:* 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' <af@af.afmug.com>
    <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>
    *Subject:* [ External ] Re: [AFMUG] Cambium LTE

    You should probably talk to someone at Cambium, unless someone
    here has already done that.  There was talk 1-2 years ago about
    450m is software defined so maybe they could use it as a remote
    radio head with their cnRanger LTE BaseBand Unit (BBU).  It has
    been pretty quiet since then, but I haven’t been able to make it
    to the shows.

    Without an update directly from the horse’s mouth like Matt at
    Cambium, or some kind of announcement, I wouldn’t hold my
    breath.  Back in 2018 it was in the realm of “it would be nice”. 
    That’s pretty tentative.  Plus you’d still have to buy the BBU
    and new CPE, so it doesn’t sound like a huge savings anyway,
    still 2/3 of a forklift upgrade.  I mean, if it turned out that
    the 3 GHz cnRanger RRH was literally a 450m, that would probably
    be the best case, but how likely do you think that is?

    This is just my personal speculation, if it’s an important part
    of a decision you’re making now, you probably need to get hold of
    your Cambium regional sales manager, or the 450 or cnRanger
    product manager.  If you’re going to WISPAmerica, you can
    probably do it there.

    *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com
    <mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>> *On Behalf Of *Jason McKemie
    *Sent:* Monday, February 24, 2020 6:03 PM
    *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com
    <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>>
    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium LTE

    So the 450M is supposed to be LTE upgradable?

    On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 3:45 PM Steve Jones
    <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote:

        Something aboit the medusa top can be used with cnranger
        potentially with a fiber run and a software update

        On Mon, Feb 24, 2020, 3:38 PM Adam Moffett
        <dmmoff...@gmail.com <mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com>> wrote:

            In my opinion, 450 is better than Baicells or Telrad LTE
            at everything except NLOS performance.

            ....Except that NLOS performance is so useful that one
            can be tempted to ignore all of the other features of the
            450.  I do understand that tradeoff because I've had to
            make it myself.

            On 2/24/2020 4:30 PM, David Williamson wrote:

                450 3.65Ghz vs. Baicells 3.65Ghz LTE = no
                comparison.  All but one of the 450 APs are already
                removed from our network.  I am just trying to
                determine if the SMs will be usable on Cambium LTE
                once they roll it out, or if it will require a
                completely different SM.


                David

                *From:*AF [mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com] *On Behalf
                Of *Jason McKemie
                *Sent:* Monday, February 24, 2020 4:28 PM
                *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
                *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium LTE

                Why are you getting rid of 3.65 Cambium in favor of LTE?

                On Monday, February 24, 2020, David Williamson
                <dwilliam...@customcomputersva.com
                <mailto:dwilliam...@customcomputersva.com>> wrote:

                Will the Cambium 3.65 LTE have a completely new SM or
                will it use the existing 450SM's?  Trying to
                determine if I should keep our 450SM's or just go
                ahead and sell them to one of our secondary market
                distributors along with our 450 AP's.

                Thanks!

                David Williamson


                -----Original Message-----
                From: AF [mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com
                <mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>] On Behalf Of Adam
                Moffett
                Sent: Monday, February 24, 2020 1:57 PM
                To: af@af.afmug.com <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>
                Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium LTE

                I think I heard next quarter for the 3.5.

                On 2/24/2020 1:48 PM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists wrote:
                > 3.5 isn’t available yet.
                >
                > I believe that 2.5 can be purchased.
                >
                > Jeff Broadwick
                > CTIconnect
                > 312-205-2519 Office
                > 574-220-7826 Cell
                > jbroadw...@cticonnect.com
                <mailto:jbroadw...@cticonnect.com>
                >
                >> On Feb 24, 2020, at 12:44 PM, Avatar Davis
                <acd...@mail.harvard.edu
                <mailto:acd...@mail.harvard.edu>> wrote:
                >>
                >> Does anyone have experience with Cambium LTE? I
                am highly dissatisfied with my current manufacturer
                and was wondering if anyone had experience
                using/demoing their product line. Cambium products
                seem consistently good in my experience.
                >>
                >>
                >> --
                >> AF mailing list
                >> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
                >>
                http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
                
<https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Faf.afmug.com%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Faf_af.afmug.com&data=02%7C01%7Cmatt.mangriotis%40cambiumnetworks.com%7Cb86add20912747adc42b08d7b98f079e%7C0e263e36340946228ac818d993e76eb6%7C0%7C0%7C637181896280372524&sdata=sDEJMwg%2FrUeE9YW6GqIDR1XzERRWkE%2F6XePPnWoPmRg%3D&reserved=0>
                >

-- AF mailing list
                AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
                http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
                
<https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Faf.afmug.com%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Faf_af.afmug.com&data=02%7C01%7Cmatt.mangriotis%40cambiumnetworks.com%7Cb86add20912747adc42b08d7b98f079e%7C0e263e36340946228ac818d993e76eb6%7C0%7C0%7C637181896280382518&sdata=pP5xMGSatWmczFjAPjC1wEXnNEcBOceklsDEIeHxs6c%3D&reserved=0>
-- AF mailing list
                AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
                http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
                
<https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Faf.afmug.com%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Faf_af.afmug.com&data=02%7C01%7Cmatt.mangriotis%40cambiumnetworks.com%7Cb86add20912747adc42b08d7b98f079e%7C0e263e36340946228ac818d993e76eb6%7C0%7C0%7C637181896280382518&sdata=pP5xMGSatWmczFjAPjC1wEXnNEcBOceklsDEIeHxs6c%3D&reserved=0>

-- AF mailing list
            AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
            http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
            
<https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Faf.afmug.com%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Faf_af.afmug.com&data=02%7C01%7Cmatt.mangriotis%40cambiumnetworks.com%7Cb86add20912747adc42b08d7b98f079e%7C0e263e36340946228ac818d993e76eb6%7C0%7C0%7C637181896280392515&sdata=%2BbZTwYPdzPsYWDRGoWDCC16Kx5oRKh7VKuFLS8xZ%2Bek%3D&reserved=0>

-- AF mailing list
        AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
        
<https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Faf.afmug.com%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Faf_af.afmug.com&data=02%7C01%7Cmatt.mangriotis%40cambiumnetworks.com%7Cb86add20912747adc42b08d7b98f079e%7C0e263e36340946228ac818d993e76eb6%7C0%7C0%7C637181896280392515&sdata=%2BbZTwYPdzPsYWDRGoWDCC16Kx5oRKh7VKuFLS8xZ%2Bek%3D&reserved=0>



-- AF mailing list
    AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com



-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to