Birds will be bursting into flames in mid air.

 

From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of Mark Radabaugh
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2020 8:44 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium LTE

 

50W in a 10Mhz channel, close to 80W (49dBm) in a 30Mhz channel.  

 

Mark

 

 





On Feb 24, 2020, at 8:29 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller <par...@cyberbroadband.net 
<mailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net> > wrote:

 


What is the new cbrs power level? 

 

Sent from my smartphone

 

----- Reply message -----
From: "Jeff Broadwick - Lists" < <mailto:jeffl...@att.net> jeffl...@att.net>
To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" < <mailto:af@af.afmug.com> 
af@af.afmug.com>
Subject: [AFMUG] Cambium LTE
Date: Mon, Feb 24, 2020 3:59 PM


Have you tested with the CBRS power levels Dave?



Jeff Broadwick

CTIconnect

312-205-2519 Office

574-220-7826 Cell

 <mailto:jbroadw...@cticonnect.com> jbroadw...@cticonnect.com





On Feb 24, 2020, at 3:42 PM, David Williamson < 
<mailto:dwilliam...@customcomputersva.com> dwilliam...@customcomputersva.com> 
wrote:



3.65Ghz 450 vs. Baicells is not better = we have real-world testing that says 
otherwise.  And in NLOS environment 450 is non-existent, so that isn’t even a 
conversation between the two.  My question is will the 450SM’s work with 
Cambium LTE product?  I would like confirmation on that if you all are able, 
because if they will not then I am going to offload them along with my 450 APs 
I am selling.


Thanks,


David

 

From: AF [ <mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com> mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com] On 
Behalf Of Adam Moffett
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2020 4:38 PM
To:  <mailto:af@af.afmug.com> af@af.afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium LTE

 

In my opinion, 450 is better than Baicells or Telrad LTE at everything except 
NLOS performance.  

....Except that NLOS performance is so useful that one can be tempted to ignore 
all of the other features of the 450.  I do understand that tradeoff because 
I've had to make it myself.

 

On 2/24/2020 4:30 PM, David Williamson wrote:

450 3.65Ghz vs. Baicells 3.65Ghz LTE = no comparison.  All but one of the 450 
APs are already removed from our network..  I am just trying to determine if 
the SMs will be usable on Cambium LTE once they roll it out, or if it will 
require a completely different SM.


David

 

From: AF [ <mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com> mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com] On 
Behalf Of Jason McKemie
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2020 4:28 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium LTE

 

Why are you getting rid of 3.65 Cambium in favor of LTE?

On Monday, February 24, 2020, David Williamson < 
<mailto:dwilliam...@customcomputersva.com> dwilliam...@customcomputersva.com> 
wrote:

Will the Cambium 3.65 LTE have a completely new SM or will it use the existing 
450SM's?  Trying to determine if I should keep our 450SM's or just go ahead and 
sell them to one of our secondary market distributors along with our 450 AP's.

Thanks!

David Williamson


-----Original Message-----
From: AF [mailto: <mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com> af-boun...@af.afmug.com] On 
Behalf Of Adam Moffett
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2020 1:57 PM
To:  <mailto:af@af.afmug.com> af@af.afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium LTE

I think I heard next quarter for the 3.5.

On 2/24/2020 1:48 PM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists wrote:
> 3.5 isn’t available yet.
>
> I believe that 2.5 can be purchased.
>
> Jeff Broadwick
> CTIconnect
> 312-205-2519 Office
> 574-220-7826 Cell
>  <mailto:jbroadw...@cticonnect.com> jbroadw...@cticonnect.com
>
>> On Feb 24, 2020, at 12:44 PM, Avatar Davis < 
>> <mailto:acd...@mail.harvard.edu> acd...@mail.harvard.edu> wrote:
>>
>> Does anyone have experience with Cambium LTE? I am highly dissatisfied with 
>> my current manufacturer and was wondering if anyone had experience 
>> using/demoing their product line. Cambium products seem consistently good in 
>> my experience.
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> AF mailing list
>>  <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> AF@af.afmug.com
>>  <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug..com> 
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>

-- 
AF mailing list
 <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> AF@af.afmug.com
 <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
 <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> AF@af.afmug.com
 <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af..afmug.com






-- 
AF mailing list
 <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> AF@af.afmug.com
 <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
 <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> AF@af.afmug.com
 <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

 

-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to