On Feb 26, 2020, at 10:25 AM, Mathew Howard
<mhoward...@gmail.com <mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Yeah, but tricky part is going to be stuff that's still
operating legally under an unexpired license that the SAS
can't manage. I think it would be wise to make sure
everything is properly registered and you're not doing
anything questionable if you plan to keep operating under
the old rules much beyond April.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 9:17 AM Steve Jones
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com
<mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I was told when I asked about examples being made that
hopefully SAS will sort things out on its own. If it
goes outside of SAS being able to manage an issue, such
all illegal operators, particularly when more sensing
capability comes into play with SAS 2.0, you do not want
to be the guy who gets nailed. Apparently this iteration
of the SAS modality is an entry run for a much larger
spectrum management, as is the cowboy days are over
moving forward
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 8:54 AM Mathew Howard
<mhoward...@gmail.com <mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Yeah, I agree, they probably will make an example
out of a few operators. But I don't see any reason
why they'd bother with somebody who still has a
valid license. They'll probably go after some guys
that are blatantly running some old Ubiquiti or
WiMax gear after their license expires.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 6:56 AM Mark Radabaugh
<m...@amplex.net <mailto:m...@amplex.net>> wrote:
> On Feb 25, 2020, at 5:20 PM, Mathew Howard
<mhoward...@gmail.com
<mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> <cut>
> I would assume that if a CBRS operator puts up
gear that you're interfering with, it's going to
be handled pretty much the same way it was under
the old rules (in other words, work it out with
eachother, or shut up and live with it)...
there's a reason that they made 3650-3700 GAA only.
>
I would expect the FCC to make an example of a
couple of operators who continue to operate 90z
equipment illegally after the license expires.
We all have too much to lose here if the
operators are not running legally and the mobile
industry starts another attempt to push everyone
out that isn’t a mobile carrier.
Mark
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
