So sounds like consensus is we can continue to operate under the NN license until 10/24/2022? I do have these AP locations registered and will double check power is within limits. Thanks Chris
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020, 10:32 AM Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net> wrote: > I would very much second that statement - make sure you are following all > the rules for 90z going forward. > > Mark > > On Feb 26, 2020, at 10:25 AM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yeah, but tricky part is going to be stuff that's still operating legally > under an unexpired license that the SAS can't manage. I think it would be > wise to make sure everything is properly registered and you're not doing > anything questionable if you plan to keep operating under the old rules > much beyond April. > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 9:17 AM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I was told when I asked about examples being made that hopefully SAS will >> sort things out on its own. If it goes outside of SAS being able to manage >> an issue, such all illegal operators, particularly when more sensing >> capability comes into play with SAS 2.0, you do not want to be the guy who >> gets nailed. Apparently this iteration of the SAS modality is an entry run >> for a much larger spectrum management, as is the cowboy days are over >> moving forward >> >> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 8:54 AM Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Yeah, I agree, they probably will make an example out of a few >>> operators. But I don't see any reason why they'd bother with somebody who >>> still has a valid license. They'll probably go after some guys that are >>> blatantly running some old Ubiquiti or WiMax gear after their license >>> expires. >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 6:56 AM Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> > On Feb 25, 2020, at 5:20 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > <cut> >>>> >>>> > I would assume that if a CBRS operator puts up gear that you're >>>> interfering with, it's going to be handled pretty much the same way it was >>>> under the old rules (in other words, work it out with eachother, or shut up >>>> and live with it)... there's a reason that they made 3650-3700 GAA only. >>>> > >>>> >>>> I would expect the FCC to make an example of a couple of operators who >>>> continue to operate 90z equipment illegally after the license expires. We >>>> all have too much to lose here if the operators are not running legally and >>>> the mobile industry starts another attempt to push everyone out that isn’t >>>> a mobile carrier. >>>> >>>> Mark >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> AF mailing list >>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
