Yeah, I agree, they probably will make an example out of a few operators. But I don't see any reason why they'd bother with somebody who still has a valid license. They'll probably go after some guys that are blatantly running some old Ubiquiti or WiMax gear after their license expires.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 6:56 AM Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net> wrote: > > > On Feb 25, 2020, at 5:20 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > <cut> > > > I would assume that if a CBRS operator puts up gear that you're > interfering with, it's going to be handled pretty much the same way it was > under the old rules (in other words, work it out with eachother, or shut up > and live with it)... there's a reason that they made 3650-3700 GAA only. > > > > I would expect the FCC to make an example of a couple of operators who > continue to operate 90z equipment illegally after the license expires. We > all have too much to lose here if the operators are not running legally and > the mobile industry starts another attempt to push everyone out that isn’t > a mobile carrier. > > Mark > > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
