Perhaps some type of supercap instead of a battery? That’s about the only way I could see truly fast charging time since you are not using a chemical reaction, just storing electrons.
https://cleantechnica.com/2018/02/27/supercapacitor-research-promises-10-minute-charging-times-200-mile-range/ <https://cleantechnica.com/2018/02/27/supercapacitor-research-promises-10-minute-charging-times-200-mile-range/> Safety should be interesting. That’s a hell of a lot of energy density with very little to rate limit converting it back to heat - talk about the potential for a really big boom. Mark > On Mar 5, 2019, at 9:49 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) > <li...@packetflux.com> wrote: > > A while back I read that these new stations would have local storage of some > sort. That would limit the short term grid impact. > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019, 5:15 PM Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com > <mailto:part15...@gmail.com>> wrote: > They announced it today as the Supercharger V3. Capable of up to 350KW, but > would "typically" run in the 200KW range (give or take). To take advantage of > the higher charge rates, the vehicle battery packs will need to be enhanced > to allow them to take that amount of power. > > -- > bp > part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com > > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 4:01 PM Sterling Jacobson <sterl...@avative.net > <mailto:sterl...@avative.net>> wrote: > Again, I think they meant about 5 hours to charge, not just under four > minutes, lol! > > > > From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>> On Behalf > Of Bill Prince > Sent: Monday, March 4, 2019 4:43 PM > To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com > <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT New electric car > > > > I thought I read that Tesla announced a new "super" super charger that could > do 350KW. > > > > -- > > bp > > part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 2:28 PM Nate Burke <n...@blastcomm.com > <mailto:n...@blastcomm.com>> wrote: > > Isn't that the kind of electric service you have running to your house? > Didn't I see the latest Tesla chargers are 200-250kw. > > On 3/4/2019 4:20 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > > Piech Mark Zero > > Claims 311 mile range. At 3.11 miles per kW that would be a 100 kWh battery. > OK, within the realm of posibilities. > > > > 4:40 minutes to 80% battery capacity. > > > > So 280 seconds or .077 hours to dump 83 kWh into the battery. > > 83/.077=1067 kW > > > > So you have to have 1 Megawatt power source to charge? > > 2223 amps of 480 service. > > > > I am doubting this. > > > > > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>-- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com> > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com> > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com