On 04/16/2013 09:26 PM, Grant Street wrote: > I understand that getting a good backup is the most important, but > when you offer a feature that is "best efforts" with no way to > verify, why have the feature?
Your conceptualization of the "feature" is inverted from the conceptualization under which it was implemented. I view collocation as a tool to "Keep data from a given node in physical proximity, to reduce mount latency at restore time". Any of you who have attempted to service restores from a large pool of uncollocated data (raises hand) would see this as the primary purpose of the tool, too. (mutter mutter read docs). There: 'help def stg': " Collocation reduces the number of sequential access media mounts for restore, retrieve, and recall operations. " So collocation accomplishes that feature goal quite well; and since the goal is to "improve" locality of reference, not 'make perfect' or such, no alert is required when we spill over. - Allen S. Rout