I used to use some custom stuff built with GNU Barcode and perl. These days I use the online pdf-based generator at tapelabels.librelogiciel.com.
--Jim On 6/30/09 3:34 PM, "Len Boyle" <len.bo...@sas.com> wrote: > Jim > > Which software are you using to print your tape labels? > > len > > -----Original Message----- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Jim > Zajkowski > Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 11:24 AM > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Query on ultrium cleaning cartridges > > All of my cleaning tapes are "CU" not "L1" (CLNU55CU). I didn't realize > there was a specific cleaning tape per LTO generation. > > We print our own labels and found that Xerox Phaser (thermal wax) output was > too shiny; the 3584 tolerates labels from our HP though. > > --Jim > > > On 6/30/09 10:09 AM, "Bill Boyer" <bjdbo...@verizon.net> wrote: > >> Had that problem once with a 3583 library. The CE said to either take an >> eraser to the labels to dull them, or put a piece of scotch tape over them. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of >> Richard Sims >> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 9:48 AM >> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU >> Subject: Re: Query on ultrium cleaning cartridges >> >> On Jun 30, 2009, at 9:39 AM, Baker, Jane wrote: >> >>> CLNU030L1 >> >> That's 9 characters - no good. >> Your TS3500 Introduction and Planning Guide manual details tape labels >> for that library. >> You can probably revert to the "shiny" labels, using a pencil eraser >> to "de-gloss" them. I had to do this on some early 3590 labels, which >> fixed their similar issue. >> >> Richard Sims >> >> >> > > !DSPAM:2,4a4a69ab201767794136845! >
