Jim Which software are you using to print your tape labels?
len -----Original Message----- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Jim Zajkowski Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 11:24 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Query on ultrium cleaning cartridges All of my cleaning tapes are "CU" not "L1" (CLNU55CU). I didn't realize there was a specific cleaning tape per LTO generation. We print our own labels and found that Xerox Phaser (thermal wax) output was too shiny; the 3584 tolerates labels from our HP though. --Jim On 6/30/09 10:09 AM, "Bill Boyer" <bjdbo...@verizon.net> wrote: > Had that problem once with a 3583 library. The CE said to either take an > eraser to the labels to dull them, or put a piece of scotch tape over them. > > -----Original Message----- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of > Richard Sims > Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 9:48 AM > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: Query on ultrium cleaning cartridges > > On Jun 30, 2009, at 9:39 AM, Baker, Jane wrote: > >> CLNU030L1 > > That's 9 characters - no good. > Your TS3500 Introduction and Planning Guide manual details tape labels > for that library. > You can probably revert to the "shiny" labels, using a pencil eraser > to "de-gloss" them. I had to do this on some early 3590 labels, which > fixed their similar issue. > > Richard Sims > > !DSPAM:2,4a4a208123431804284693! >
