Hi Tore,
El 15/7/19 14:02, "Tore Anderson" <[email protected]> escribió:
* JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg
> -> Because I think when there is an unfair situation (some folks bound to
rules/policies, others not), there is a problem.
...
> -> Because is not subjected to the same rules (policies) as the
non-legacy one. That's unfair.
Thank you for clarifying. I don't believe this «unfairness» rationale had
been mentioned before.
Others have explained how the legacy resources were given out with no RIR
policy strings attached. You could make the opposite argument too, i.e., that
it would be unfair behaviour by the RIPE community to try and retroactively
annex legacy space in this way by unilaterally applying terms and conditions
that were never agreed to in the first place.
-> We agree here. It may be considered unfair in one direction or the other
one. It depends on the perspective.
In any case, and to be perfectly honest, this rationale reads to like petty
jealousy to me - «I can't do X with my RIPE ALLOCATED PA, so I don't want
others to be able to do X either».
-> I don't have resources of any type (legacy neither non-legacy) in any RIR,
so my view is trying to be as objective as possible and looking for the
fairness of the more global community.
I don't believe this kind of policy making is good for the community. I
suspect the opposite is true, by turning legacy holders off from engaging with
us. Keep in mind that they are under no obligation to do so.
-> I guess it is not still clear enoght. This doesn't affect legacy holders. It
is only affecting the resources once they got transferred.
A more positive way to approach this perceived unfairness would be to focus
on what X is, and see if the RIPE policy can be changed to permit it.
Tore
**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the
individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure,
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if
partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be
considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the
original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
