We, as a community, should look for the benefit of the community.

With that in mind, in that case we should have that to be the *only choice*.

Alternatively the buyer can still do the process outside the policy process, 
because he is opting to not convert the resources to non-legacy.

I've already said this, but let me to repeat it: This is my opinion, and it 
looks was the opinion of the other 4 RIR communities.

You opinion can be diverse, of course, but it is clear that I'm not alone.
 

El 17/7/19 19:54, "Gert Doering" <[email protected]> escribió:

    Hi,
    
    On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 06:48:46PM +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via 
address-policy-wg wrote:
    > -> I don't think this is "delicate" at all. Nobody is being *forced* to 
do that. If you have legacy, you can do transfers outside the system and nobody 
can oppose to that. However, please read the complete email from Mike 
(yesterday), I don't think nobody noticed it ... and they key think here is the 
protection of the "buyer", which is secured if the addresses are converted to 
non-legacy.
    
    If the buyer sees a benefit in coverting legacy space to non-legacy,
    they can do this today.
    
    Gert Doering
            -- NetMaster
    -- 
    have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
    
    SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael 
Emmer
    Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
    D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
    Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or 
confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the 
individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, 
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if 
partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be 
considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware 
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly 
prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the 
original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.




Reply via email to