On Sun, Jan 05, 2025 at 10:46:16PM -0800, Ron Minnich wrote:
> Do people have a preferred place to start from?
> 
> I'm inclined to something like this:
> g...@github.com:rminnich/nix-os.git
> 
> grab that, cd nix/sys/src/nix/k10
> mk
> 
> and see how it goes. We need a shared place to record our experiences
> -- suggestions?
> 
> I think our goal this week should be that we figure out who's working
> on this; goal for end of next week is that everyone working on it at
> least try to get that repo and do the mk and see if fail ;-)
> 
> Ori recently fixed 9front git so it can pull from github -- it was a
> github bug ...

I'm OK with this scheme. I have decided to reserve some hours on
Saturdays and/or Sundays, to try/work with this.

> 
> On Sun, Jan 5, 2025 at 7:57?PM Christopher Nielsen <cniel...@pobox.com> wrote:
> >
> > I'm interested.
> >
> > Not 100% sure how much work I'll be able to do, but like you said, pace 
> > yourself and be consistent. :-)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Chris
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 5, 2025, 08:39 Ron Minnich <rminn...@p9f.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> No need for money yet!
> >>
> >> Let's get this party started. I have queries in to ampere as to how we
> >> can set up a simulator. However, if someone wants to take a first
> >> step, take that 2011 code, bring it to your plan 9 system, and see if
> >> it builds.
> >>
> >> Again, the key here is a sustained effort. You don't have to do a lot
> >> each week, but you don't want to start and then drop it. So it needs
> >> to NOT become all consuming. It's all about pacing yourself. Anybody
> >> who's ever spent a few weeks digging ditches can tell you -- set up a
> >> work effort you can sustain. Same thing here.
> >>
> >> So, how about we figure out who here is interested, then start off:
> >> get  the code, see if it builds. Who's in? Don't feel out of your
> >> depth: if you can type mk, you're ready to start. Don't assume it's a
> >> slog through code: take time to alternate looking at code, and reading
> >> docs. Do learn how to use something like qemu -- it's a real
> >> timesaver, since you can debug the kernel interactively.
> >>
> >> Don't kill yourself if you hit a wall about some code -- bring it
> >> here, and ask questions. That's why we're here.
> >>
> >> So, Step 1: anyone? anyone?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Ron
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jan 5, 2025 at 7:22?AM Daniel Maslowski via 9fans
> >> <9fans@9fans.net> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > There have been other ideas in similar directions over the years.
> >> > E.g. 
> >> > https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342759611_SCE-Comm_A_Real-Time_Inter-Core_Communication_Framework_for_Strictly_Partitioned_Multi-core_Processors
> >> >  about the concepts of ACs and CCs (communication cores).
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, 5 Jan 2025, 01:49 Charles Forsyth, <charles.fors...@gmail.com> 
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> i think brazil experimented with networking outside the kernel but it 
> >> >> was pushed back in
> >> >>
> >> >> On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 at 00:24, Thaddeus Woskowiak <tswoskow...@gmail.com> 
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Sat, Jan 4, 2025 at 1:03?PM Bakul Shah via 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> 
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > On Jan 4, 2025, at 9:35?AM, Stuart Morrow <morrow.stu...@gmail.com> 
> >> >>> > wrote:
> >> >>> > >> This has been a very interesting discussion, thanks all. My offer
> >> >>> > >> remains: if anyone wants to revive NIX, I am happy to help.
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > Am I the only one who sees that the Fastcall stuff would be good 
> >> >>> > > for
> >> >>> > > bringing some devices out of the kernel (that are devs only for
> >> >>> > > performance reasons)?
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > And then, closer to what Fastcall was actually for (fossil and
> >> >>> > > venti>disk), you also have ??fs>nusb/disk>disk, which could always 
> >> >>> > > do
> >> >>> > > with a speedup.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > I've been meaning to ask... What is the typical *overhead* of a 9p
> >> >>> > call to a user level driver compared to a kernel based driver?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> From what I know the only performance issue for 'user-space <->
> >> >>> kernel-space' 9P are context switches. IP is in-kernel to eliminate
> >> >>> context switches for ether(3) <-> ip(3).
> >> >
> >> > 9fans / 9fans / see discussions + participants + delivery options 
> >> > Permalink
> >
> > 9fans / 9fans / see discussions + participants + delivery options Permalink

-- 
        Thierry Laronde <tlaronde +AT+ kergis +dot+ com>
                     http://www.kergis.com/
                    http://kertex.kergis.com/
Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89  250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C

------------------------------------------
9fans: 9fans
Permalink: 
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T7692a612f26c8ec5-M6737d80edd9e8e5f16ca3032
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription

Reply via email to