On 8/14/10 Aug 14, 2:57 PM, "Edward Ned Harvey" <sh...@nedharvey.com> wrote:
>> Or Btrfs. It may not be ready for production now, but it could become a >> serious alternative to ZFS in one year's time or so. (I have been using > > I will much sooner pay for sol11 instead of use btrfs. Stability & speed & > maturity greatly outweigh a few hundred dollars a year, if you run your > business on it. Flip side is that if Oracle convinces enough people that ZFS is a shrinking market (how long do you think the BSDs will support a proprietary filesystem?) then there will be a lot more interest in the BTRFS project, much of it from the same folks who have experience producing enterprise-grade ZFS. Speaking for myself, if Solaris 11 doesn't include COMSTAR I'm going to have to take a serious look at another alternative for our show storage towers.... -- Dave Pooser, ACSA Manager of Information Services Alford Media http://www.alfordmedia.com _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
