Really sad. Will all the opensolaris-related mailing lists be dead? Thanks.
Fred > -----Original Message----- > From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Andrej Podzimek > Sent: 星期六, 八月 14, 2010 23:36 > To: Russ Price > Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Opensolaris is apparently dead > > > 3. Just stick with b134. Actually, I've managed to compile my way up > to b142, but I'm having trouble getting beyond it - my attempts to > install later versions just result in new boot environments with the > old kernel, even with the latest pkg-gate code in place. Still, even if > I get the latest code to install, it's not viable for the long term > unless I'm willing to live with stasis. > > I run build 146. There have been some heads-up messages on the topic. > You need b137 or later in order to build b143 or later. Plus the latest > packaging bits and other stuff. > http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/on-discuss/2010-June/001932.html > > When compiling b146, it's good to read this first: > http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/on-discuss/2010- > August/002110.html Instead of using the tagged onnv_146 code, you have > to apply all the changesets up to 13011:dc5824d1233f. > > > 6. Abandon ZFS completely and go back to LVM/MD-RAID. I ran it for > years before switching to ZFS, and it works - but it's a bitter pill to > swallow after drinking the ZFS Kool-Aid. > > Or Btrfs. It may not be ready for production now, but it could become a > serious alternative to ZFS in one year's time or so. (I have been using > it for some time with absolutely no issues, but some people (Edward > Shishkin) say it has obvious bugs related to fragmentation.) > > Andrej _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
