On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:45:58AM -0700, Brent Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Chad Cantwell <c...@iomail.org> wrote:
> > No, this wasn't it.  A non debug build with the same NIGHTLY_OPTIONS
> > at Rich Lowe's 142 build is still very slow...
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 09:52:10AM -0700, Chad Cantwell wrote:
> >> Yes, I think this might have been it.  I missed the NIGHTLY_OPTIONS 
> >> variable in
> >> opensolaris and I think it was compiling a debug build.  I'm not sure what 
> >> the
> >> ramifications are of this or how much slower a debug build should be, but 
> >> I'm
> >> recompiling a release build now so hopefully all will be well.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Chad
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 08:39:42AM +0100, Robert Milkowski wrote:
> >> > On 20/07/2010 07:59, Chad Cantwell wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >I've just compiled and booted into snv_142, and I experienced the same 
> >> > >slow dd and
> >> > >scrubbing as I did with my 142 and 143 compilations and with the 
> >> > >Nexanta 3 RC2 CD.
> >> > >So, this would seem to indicate a build environment/process flaw rather 
> >> > >than a
> >> > >regression.
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > Are you sure it is not a debug vs. non-debug issue?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Robert Milkowski
> >> > http://milek.blogspot.com
> >> >
> 
> Could it somehow not be compiling 64-bit support?
> 
> 
> -- 
> Brent Jones
> br...@servuhome.net

I thought about that but it says when it boots up that it is 64-bit, and I'm 
able to run
64-bit binaries.  I wonder if it's compiling for the wrong processor 
optomization though?
Maybe if it is missing some of the newer SSEx instructions the zpool checksum 
checking is
slowed down significantly?  I don't know how to check for this though and it 
seems strange
it would slow it down this significantly.  I'd expect even a non-SSE enabled 
binary to 
be able to calculate a few hundred MB of checksums per second for a 2.5+ghz 
processor.

Chad
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to