No, this wasn't it. A non debug build with the same NIGHTLY_OPTIONS at Rich Lowe's 142 build is still very slow...
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 09:52:10AM -0700, Chad Cantwell wrote: > Yes, I think this might have been it. I missed the NIGHTLY_OPTIONS variable > in > opensolaris and I think it was compiling a debug build. I'm not sure what the > ramifications are of this or how much slower a debug build should be, but I'm > recompiling a release build now so hopefully all will be well. > > Thanks, > Chad > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 08:39:42AM +0100, Robert Milkowski wrote: > > On 20/07/2010 07:59, Chad Cantwell wrote: > > > > > >I've just compiled and booted into snv_142, and I experienced the same > > >slow dd and > > >scrubbing as I did with my 142 and 143 compilations and with the Nexanta 3 > > >RC2 CD. > > >So, this would seem to indicate a build environment/process flaw rather > > >than a > > >regression. > > > > > > > Are you sure it is not a debug vs. non-debug issue? > > > > > > -- > > Robert Milkowski > > http://milek.blogspot.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > zfs-discuss mailing list > > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
