On Jul 4, 2010, at 1:33 AM, R. Eulenberg wrote:

> R. Eulenberg <ron2105 <at> web.de> writes:
> 
>> 
>>>>   op> I was setting up a new systen (osol 2009.06
>>> and updating to
>>>>   op> the lastest version of osol/dev - snv_134 -
>>> with
>>>>   op> deduplication) and then I tried to import my
>>> backup zpool, but
>>>>   op> it does not work.  
>>>> 
>>>>   op> # zpool import -f tank1 
>>>>   op> cannot import 'tank1': one or more devices
>>> is currently unavailable 
>>>>   op> Destroy and re-create the pool from a backup
>>> source
>>>> 
>>>>   op> Any other option (-F, -X, -V, -D) and any
>>> combination of them
>>>>   op> doesn't helps too.
>> 
>>>> R., please let us know if the 'zdb -e -bcsvL
>>> <zpool-name>' incantation
>>>> Sigbjorn suggested ends up working for you or not.
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> it seems that you are talking about my case of trouble. 
>> I answered in this thread:
>> 
>> http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=485342&tstart=0#485342
>> 
>> I hope of any ideas helping me.
>> 
>> Regards
>> Ron
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> several days ago I added this:
> 
> set /zfs/:zfs_recover=/1/
> set aok=/1/
> 
> to the /etc/system file and ran:
> 
> zdb -e -bcsvL tank1
> 

settings in the /etc/systm file do not affect zdb in any way. In recent builds 
(135+) there's an option -A for zdb that allows to simulate setting one or both 
of these parameters, but anyway it is not useful in your case.

> without an output and without a prompt (prozess hangs up)

How did you arrive at this conclusion? Did you check "pstack `pgrep zdb`/1" 
output a few times?

> and result of running:
> 
> zdb -eC tank1
> 
> was the same.
> I hope you could help me because the problem isn't solved.
> 
> Regards
> Ron 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to