On 03/02/10 08:13, Fredrich Maney wrote:
Why not do the same sort of thing and use that extra bit to flag a
file, or directory, as being an ACL only file and will negate the rest
of the mask? That accomplishes what Paul is looking for, without
breaking the existing model for those that need/wish to continue to
use it?
While we're designing on the fly: Another possibility would be to use an
additional umask bit or two to influence the mode-bit - acl interaction.
- Bill
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
