On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:27:38 -0800, Joe S <js.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I appreciate the feedback.
> 
> I've decided to:
> 
> * create daily ZFS snapshots and zfs send these to separate external
> disks (via esata).

I'll be interested in hearing anything you learn about eSata on Solaris.  I
haven't used eSata anywhere yet, but it sounds good.

> * create monthly full backups via rsync, tar, or amanda on separate
> external disks.

I'm keeping daily snapshots on both my fileserver pool and the backup
pools; I'm not sure separating your incremental and daily backups like this
is beneficial in the ZFS environment.  "incremental" in this case is just
the quickest way to update the backup pool.
 
> I'm not going to store everything on S3, it is too expensive. However,
> I will keep an encrypted copy of my critical docs and items on S3 in
> case my house burns or fileserver is stolen.

Sounds rational. 

I once had the development system for a project I was working on stolen out
of the lab.  It's a good thing they didn't grab all the nearby floppy
disks, because those included the backups (nothing outside that room; not
good practice).  This was in the era where backups were being made on
floppies, so it was a somewhat painstaking manual process, and my backups
were 3 days out of date.  Luckily I had a lab notebook telling in some
detail what I'd done during those three days, and it only took about half a
day to do it again from the notes.  But no manager there had ever said a
thing to me about backing up that box; I just did it on my own because it
was obviously necessary.  And I really should have taken the disks back to
my desk, which was not in that room. 

Yeah, off-site backups are very important. 
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to