In other words: Dont feed the troll.
Greets Jan Dreyer zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org <> wrote : > Good. It looks like this thread can finally die. I received the > following in response to my message below: > > > > > This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification > > Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: > > cont...@desystems.cc > > Technical details of permanent failure: > Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the > recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for > further information about the cause of this error. The error that the > other server returned was: 553 553 5.3.0 <cont...@desystems.cc>... > Your spam was rejected! (state 14). > > > > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Fredrich Maney > <fredrichma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:14 PM, D. Eckert > <cont...@desystems.cc> wrote: >>> I think you are not reading carefully enough, and I >>> can trace from your reply a typically American >>> arrogant behavior. >>> >>> WE, THE PROUDEST AND infallibles on earth DID NEVER MAKE >>> a mistake. It is just the stupid user who did not read the >>> fucking manual carefully enough. >>> >>> ???? >> >> Ah... an illiterate AND idiotic bigot. Have you even read the manual >> or *ANY* of the replies to your posts? *YOU* caused the situation >> that resulted in your data being corrupted. Not Sun, not >> OpenSolaris, not ZFS and not anyone on this list. Yet you feel the >> need to blame ZFS and insult the people that have been trying to >> help you understand what happened and why you shouldn't do what you >> did. >> >> ZFS is not a filesystem like UFS or Reiserfs, nor is it an LVM like >> SVM or VxVM. It is both a filesystem and a logical volume manager. As >> such, like all LVM solutions, there are two steps that you must >> perform to safely remove a disk: unmount the filesystem and quiesce >> the volume. That means you *MUST*, in the case of ZFS, issue 'umount >> filesystem' *AND* 'zpool export' before you yank the USB stick out >> of the machine. >> >> Effectively what you did was create a one-sided mirrored volume with >> one filesystem on it, then put your very important (but not important >> enough to bother mirroring or backing up) data on it. Then you >> unmounted the filesystem and ripped the active volume out of the >> machine. You got away with it a couple of times because just how good >> of a job the ZFS developers did at idiot proofing it, but when it >> finally got to the point where you lost your data, you came here to >> bitch and point fingers at everyone but the responsible party (hint, >> it's you). When your ignorance (and fault) was pointed out to you, >> you then resorted to personal attacks and slurs. Nice. Very >> professional. Welcome to the bit-bucket. >> >> fpsm >> > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
