Good. It looks like this thread can finally die. I received the
following in response to my message below:
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
cont...@desystems.cc
Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the
recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for
further information about the cause of this error. The error that the
other server returned was: 553 553 5.3.0 <cont...@desystems.cc>...
Your spam was rejected! (state 14).
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Fredrich Maney
<fredrichma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:14 PM, D. Eckert <cont...@desystems.cc> wrote:
>> I think you are not reading carefully enough, and I
>> can trace from your reply a typically American
>> arrogant behavior.
>>
>> WE, THE PROUDEST AND infallibles on earth DID NEVER MAKE
>> a mistake. It is just the stupid user who did not read the
>> fucking manual carefully enough.
>>
>> ????
>
> Ah... an illiterate AND idiotic bigot. Have you even read the manual
> or *ANY* of the replies to your posts? *YOU* caused the situation that
> resulted in your data being corrupted. Not Sun, not OpenSolaris, not
> ZFS and not anyone on this list. Yet you feel the need to blame ZFS
> and insult the people that have been trying to help you understand
> what happened and why you shouldn't do what you did.
>
> ZFS is not a filesystem like UFS or Reiserfs, nor is it an LVM like
> SVM or VxVM. It is both a filesystem and a logical volume manager. As
> such, like all LVM solutions, there are two steps that you must
> perform to safely remove a disk: unmount the filesystem and quiesce
> the volume. That means you *MUST*, in the case of ZFS, issue 'umount
> filesystem' *AND* 'zpool export' before you yank the USB stick out of
> the machine.
>
> Effectively what you did was create a one-sided mirrored volume with
> one filesystem on it, then put your very important (but not important
> enough to bother mirroring or backing up) data on it. Then you
> unmounted the filesystem and ripped the active volume out of the
> machine. You got away with it a couple of times because just how good
> of a job the ZFS developers did at idiot proofing it, but when it
> finally got to the point where you lost your data, you came here to
> bitch and point fingers at everyone but the responsible party (hint,
> it's you). When your ignorance (and fault) was pointed out to you, you
> then resorted to personal attacks and slurs. Nice. Very professional.
> Welcome to the bit-bucket.
>
> fpsm
>
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
