On Tue, January 13, 2009 09:51, Neil Perrin wrote: > I'm sorry about the problems. We try to be responsive to fixing bugs and > implementing new features that people are requesting for ZFS. > It's not always possible to get it right. In this instance I don't think > the > bug was reproducible, and perhaps that's why it hasn't received the > attention > it deserves. As far as I know yours is the second reported instance.
Mine (first mentioned on this mailing list last night) may not be the same thing; but it's a ZFS null pointer crash, so it may. And I think it's scrub-related. I'm currently waiting to see if anybody wants the details from the log, or the dump file, or if there's stuff I should look at. Meanwhile, I'm annoyed my home fileserver is down -- but I'm already getting far more than I'm paying for, and I think far more than I'd get from Microsoft if I reported such a problem (and the systems I'm running their software on I paid money to them for). > It may be that the problem has been fixed and that's why > we haven't seen it in-house. However, that's just speculation, and > some serious investigation is needed. My problem (which may not be the same problem) is in 2008.11, I believe that's nv101 code (or 101b?). What's my next step? -- David Dyer-Bennet, d...@dd-b.net; http://dd-b.net/ Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/data/ Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/ Dragaera: http://dragaera.info _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
