On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 00:04, Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 29 Nov 2008, Mattias Pantzare wrote: >> >> The big difference in memory usage between UFS and ZFS is that ZFS >> will have all data it caches mapped in the kernel address space. UFS >> leaves data unmapped. > > Another big difference I have heard about is that Solaris 10 on x86 only > uses something like 64MB of filesystem caching by default for UFS. This is > different than SPARC where the caching is allowed to grow. I am not sure if > OpenSolaris maintains this arbitrary limit for x86.
That is not true. I doubt that any Solaris version had that type of limit. _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
