On Sat, 29 Nov 2008, Mattias Pantzare wrote: > > The big difference in memory usage between UFS and ZFS is that ZFS > will have all data it caches mapped in the kernel address space. UFS > leaves data unmapped.
Another big difference I have heard about is that Solaris 10 on x86 only uses something like 64MB of filesystem caching by default for UFS. This is different than SPARC where the caching is allowed to grow. I am not sure if OpenSolaris maintains this arbitrary limit for x86. Bob ====================================== Bob Friesenhahn [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/ _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
