Joerg Schilling wrote: > Carson Gaspar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> Also I'm surprised Jorg Schilly hasn't chimed yet suggesting star. :) >>> >> We need _some_ backup format that will preserve ZFS ACLs. star doesn't >> (yet), nor does any other version of tar that I know of. Sun's cpio >> didn't use to (I haven't tested it recently, anyone know for sure?), and >> if it does now, it's still cpio *shudder*. Even rsync doesn't support >> ZFS ACLs (yet). >> > > I tried to discuss the archive format for ACLs with people from Sun. > It seems that noone is interested. > > When I has time to implement ZFS ACL support, the implementation of Sun's > libsec was broken. > > If the archive format used by Sun tar and Sun cpio does not include numerical > user/group ids in addition to the names, the usability of backups made with > these programs is extemely limited. > > It does:
user:icollins:r-------------:-------:allow:1005,user:ian:r-------------:-------:allow:100 -- Ian. _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
