On 11/1/2008 11:28 AM, David Magda wrote: > On Oct 31, 2008, at 13:13, Richard Elling wrote: > >> Paul Kraus wrote: >>> Is there a ufsdump equivalent for ZFS ? For home use I really don't >>> want to have to buy a NetBackup license. >> No, and it is unlikely to happen. To some degree, ufsdump existed >> because of deficiencies in other copy applications, which have been >> largely fixed over the past 25+ years. > > How about stabilization of the 'zfs send' stream's format? > > Also I'm surprised Jorg Schilly hasn't chimed yet suggesting star. :)
We need _some_ backup format that will preserve ZFS ACLs. star doesn't (yet), nor does any other version of tar that I know of. Sun's cpio didn't use to (I haven't tested it recently, anyone know for sure?), and if it does now, it's still cpio *shudder*. Even rsync doesn't support ZFS ACLs (yet). It would be _really_ nice if someone familiar with the rather badly documented ZFS ACL APIs would contribute code to give us some working options. I suspect star and rsync are the least work, as they already have ACL frameworks. And if Sun's cpio doesn't have ZFS ACL support yet, that really needs to happen. I actually took a look at doing this for rsync, but I didn't have enough time to learn the API by trial-and-error. -- Carson _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss