Miles Nordin wrote: > sounds > like they are not good enough though, because unless this broken > router that Robert and Darren saw was doing NAT, yeah, it should not > have touch the TCP/UDP checksum.
I believe we proved that the problem bit flips were such that the TCP checksum was the same, so the original checksum still appeared correct. > BTW which router was it, or you > can't say because you're in the US? :) I can't remember; it was aging at the time. Rob T _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
