Well,   I just got in a system I am intending to be a BIG fileserver;  
background-  I work for a SAN startup, and we're expecting in our first year to 
collect 30-60 terabytes of Fibre Channel traces.  The purpose of this is to be 
a large repository for those traces w/ statistical analysis run against them. 
Looking at that storage figure,  I decided this would be a perfect application 
for ZFS.  I purchased a Super Micro chassis that's 4u and has 24 slots for SATA 
drives.  I've put one quad-core 2.66 ghz processor in & 8gig of ECC ram.   I 
put in two Areca 1231ML ( http://www.areca.com.tw/products/pcie341.htm ) 
controllers which come with Solaris drivers.  I've half-populated the chassis 
with 12  1Tb drives to begin with, and I'm running some experiments.  I loaded 
OpenSolaris 05-2008 on the system.  

I configured up an 11 drive RAID6 set + 1 hot spare on the Areca controller put 
a ZFS on that raid volume, and ran bonnie++ against it (16g size), and achieved 
150 mb/s  write, & 200 mb/s read.  I then blew that away, configured the Areca 
to present JBOD, and configured ZFS with RAIDZ2  11 disks, and a hot spare.  
Running bonnie++ against that, it  achieved 40 mb/sec read and 40 mb/sec write. 
 I wasn't expecting RAIDZ to outrun the controller-based RAID, but I wasn't 
expecting 1/3rd to 1/4 the performance.  I've looked at the ZFS tuning info on 
the solaris site, and mostly what they said is "tuning is evil", with a few 
things for Database tuning.   

Anyone got suggestions on whether there's something I might poke at to at least 
get this puppy up closer to 100 mb/sec?  Otherwise,  I may dump the JBOD and go 
back to the controller-based RAID.

Cheers
   Ross
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to