Mark Shellenbaum wrote: > Ian Collins wrote: >> Mark Shellenbaum wrote: >>> Paul B. Henson wrote: >>>> Are the libsec undocumented interfaces likely to remain the same >>>> when the >>>> acl_t structure changes? They will still require adding the >>>> prototypes to >>>> my code so the compiler knows what to make of them, but less chance of >>>> breakage is good. >>>> >>>> >>> I can't guarantee they will remain in the future. Thats why they >>> aren't documented. >>> >>> It may be that with appropriate iterators and other interfaces they >>> will no longer be needed. >>> >>> >> I'm working on a similar problem to Paul (sorry I didn't get back to you >> Paul - shifting priorities!), writing a PHP extension for ACLs, and I've >> fallen into the trap of using acl_info. Is this work you mention >> happening in the open, or in side of Sun? If it's the former, how can >> we get involved? >> >> Ian > > Currently we are just doing some preliminary discussions internal to > Sun? Were you looking to help out and provide some code? We could > probably include you in the discussions if you are interested. > I've been doing quite a bit of work on the user side of the fence recently, so yes I would be interesting in contributing.
Ian _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
