Ian Collins wrote: > Mark Shellenbaum wrote: >> Paul B. Henson wrote: >>> Are the libsec undocumented interfaces likely to remain the same when the >>> acl_t structure changes? They will still require adding the prototypes to >>> my code so the compiler knows what to make of them, but less chance of >>> breakage is good. >>> >>> >> I can't guarantee they will remain in the future. Thats why they aren't >> documented. >> >> It may be that with appropriate iterators and other interfaces they will >> no longer be needed. >> >> > I'm working on a similar problem to Paul (sorry I didn't get back to you > Paul - shifting priorities!), writing a PHP extension for ACLs, and I've > fallen into the trap of using acl_info. Is this work you mention > happening in the open, or in side of Sun? If it's the former, how can > we get involved? > > Ian
Currently we are just doing some preliminary discussions internal to Sun? Were you looking to help out and provide some code? We could probably include you in the discussions if you are interested. -Mark _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
