I have built mine the last few days, and it seems to be running fine right now.

Originally I wanted Solaris 10, but switched to using SXCE (nevada build 94, 
the latest right now) because I wanted the new CIFS support and some additional 
ZFS features.

Here's my setup. These were my goals:
- Quiet as possible
- Compact as possible
- 6 drives minimum
- Has all the right chipsets/etc. that Solaris of some sort supports

Case: Antec P182
CPU: Athlon64 X2 Dual Core 4450e 2.3GHz (figured lower power is cool)
Mobo: Asus M2N-SLI Deluxe (6 onboard SATA, 1 PATA [2 devices], 1 other SATA, 
but not supported well good enough for booting it seems)
Optical: some random IDE DVD-RW I picked up
Boot: Seagate IDE
Data: 6x1TB Seagate SATA2
RAM: 4GB(2x2GB) DDR2 PC6400 800MHz Matched Pair Kingston (non ECC, unbuffered)
Power Supply: CoolMax PS-V500 500W

I got a Zalman heatsink/fan cooler that runs at 19dBa to replace the stock AMD 
one.

I also got a 5.25" -> 3.5" enclosure so I can put my boot drive in the case. 
The case itself only has room for 6 3.5" drives normally.

Originally I had an SATA DVD-ROM on that 7th port on the motherboard, it would 
boot the Solaris 10u5 and the Nevada 94 DVDs, but when it came time to install 
the OS/drivers, it could not load the DVD any longer. So it appears that 
chipset is not supported properly yet even in snv_94 (or I just didn't know 
what I was doing)

The IDE DVD drive has no issues. I had my choice, and installed Solaris 10u5 
first, but then noticed it didn't have the in-kernel CIFS server, which I was 
really hoping to use. I'd like to get the most performance I can get. I haven't 
done any benchmarks and I am new to Solaris so I am still learning but as of 
right now I think it is smooth sailing. I was able to easily setup a zpool, 
create some ZFS filesystems, share one of them via CIFS and mount it on XP, etc.

It's a damn shame the HCL is so out of date. Also, die-hard Solaris folks don't 
seem to think this is a big issue, but someone coming from Linux/FreeBSD land 
thinks that the whole OpenSolaris vs. Nevada/SXCE vs. Solaris thing is 
confusing as hell, and made product selection a pain in the neck, as I wanted 
to build an Intel-based machine (I get discounts) and some Intel motherboards 
have 8 onboard SATA ports, but I don't know if the NIC chipsets and onboard 
video and such are supported properly... so I didn't want to order those and 
wind up having to return/RMA them somehow if they didn't work.
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to