On Fri, 16 May 2008, Vincent Fox wrote: > If/when ZFS acquires a method to ensure that spare#1 in chassis#1 > only gets used to replace failed disks in chassis#1 then I'll > reconsider my position. Currently though there is no mechanism to > ensure this so I could easily see a spare being pulled from the > other chassis and leaving me with an undesirable dependency if I > were doing ZFS with JBOD.
Good point! However, I think that the spare is only used until the original is re-constructed, so its usage should not be very long. Bob ====================================== Bob Friesenhahn [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/ _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
