This changed subject long ago... [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >>That "but it existed only in RAM in my servers" should not be a defense >>for failing to retain discoverable evidence is distinct from the issue >>of what constitutes discoverable evidence. >> >> > >But only if you were told you needed to retain the data in the >first place. How can you be faulted for not keeping data you >did not have a use for and nobody told you should be kept. > > > >>Should web site access logs be retained? >> >> > >If you have them (note that with a load balancer front-end, it is >unclear whether such logs do actually exist) The loadbalancer may >know who accesses the data but only the backend may know which >data is accessed. > > Or use a NAT device (that doesn't keep logs) to translate all of the external addresses to network 10 addresses, which your web server logs in due course... Darren _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
