It's Columbia Pictures vs. Bunnell: http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/torrentspy/columbia_v_bunnell_magistrate_order.pdf
The Register syndicated a Security Focus article that summarizes the potential impact of the court decision: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/08/08/litigation_data_retention/ -j On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 08:14:56PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >It really is a shot in the dark at this point, you really never know what > >will happen in court (take the example of the recent court decision that > >all data in RAM be held for discovery ?!WHAT, HEAD HURTS!?). But at the > >end of the day, if you waited for a sure bet on any technology or > >potential patent disputes you would not implement anything, ever. > > > Do you have a reference for "all data in RAM most be held". I guess we > need to build COW RAM as well. > > Casper > > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
