Jonathan Edwards writes: > On Dec 19, 2006, at 07:17, Roch - PAE wrote: > > > > > Shouldn't there be a big warning when configuring a pool > > with no redundancy and/or should that not require a -f flag ? > > why? what if the redundancy is below the pool .. should we > warn that ZFS isn't directly involved in redundancy decisions? >
I think so while pointing to the associated downside of doing that. -r > --- > .je _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
