On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Torrey McMahon wrote: > Al Hopper wrote: > > On Sun, 17 Dec 2006, Ricardo Correia wrote: > > > > > >> On Friday 15 December 2006 20:02, Dave Burleson wrote: > >> > >>> Does anyone have a document that describes ZFS in a pure > >>> SAN environment? What will and will not work? > >>> > >>> From some of the information I have been gathering > >>> it doesn't appear that ZFS was intended to operate > >>> in a SAN environment. > >>> > >> This might answer your question: > >> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/faq/#hardwareraid > >> > > > > The section entitled "Does ZFS work with SAN-attached devices?" does not > > make it clear the (some would say) dire effects of not having pool > > redundancy. I think that FAQ should clearly spell out the downside; i.e., > > where ZFS will "say" (Sorry Charlie) "pool is corrupt". > > > > A FAQ should always emphasize the real-world downsides to poor decisions > > made by the reader. Not delivering "bad news" does the reader a > > dis-service IMHO. > > > I'd say that it's clearly described in the FAQ. If you push to hard > people will infer that SANs are broken if you use ZFS on top of them or > vice versa. [ .... re-formatted ... but no content changed .... ]
Fair enough - I'm also in receipt of pushback from the illustrious Eric Schrock - which usually indicates that I'm on the loosing side of this argument ^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H (sorry) discussion. :) > The only bit that looks a little questionable to my eyes is ... > > Overall, ZFS functions as designed with SAN-attached devices, but if > you expose simpler devices to ZFS, you can better leverage all > available features. > > What are "simpler devices"? (I could take a guess ... ) > --- new comment ---- Let me look at a couple of possible user "bad" assumptions and see if the FAQ still reflects what a ZFS "convert" _might_ inadvertantly do. And I'll try the scenarios in mind on Update 3. In the case that I don't come up with anything worthwhile, I'll still post a followup. I think it is always best to "fess up" to a mistake or a misleading post. Regards, Al Hopper Logical Approach Inc, Plano, TX. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: 972.379.2133 Fax: 972.379.2134 Timezone: US CDT OpenSolaris.Org Community Advisory Board (CAB) Member - Apr 2005 OpenSolaris Governing Board (OGB) Member - Feb 2006 _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss