> Shouldn't there be a big warning when configuring a pool
> with no redundancy and/or should that not require a -f flag ?
why? what if the redundancy is below the pool .. should we
warn that ZFS isn't directly involved in redundancy decisions?
Because if the host controller port goes flaky and starts introducing
checksum errors at the block level (a lady a few weeks ago reported
this) ZFS will kernel panic, and most users won't expect it. Users
should be warned it seems to me to the real possibility of a kernel
panic if they don't implement redundancy at the zpool level. Just my 2
cents.
Best Regards,
Jason
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
