Nicolas Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're arguing for treating FV as extended/named attributes :)
>
> I think that'd be the right thing to do, since we have tools that are
> aware of those already. Of course, we're talking about somewhat magical
> attributes, but I think that's fine (though, IIRC, NFSv4 [RFC3530] has
> some strange verbiage limiting attributes to "applications").
I thought NFSv4 supports extended attributes. What "limiting" are you
aware of?
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
