Erik Trimble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The only idea I get thast matches this criteria is to have the versions
> > in the extended attribute name space.
> >
> > Jörg
> >
> >
> Realistically speaking, that's my conclusion, if we want a nice clean,
> well-designed solution. You need to hide the versioning info in the
> meta-tags, and create a whole new API for accessing/manipulating them.
> This easily solves (1) and (2) above, but (3) is the huge problem, as
> having a new API means you need to change the SMB/NFS protocols to allow
> for client machines to access the new API. With the new Windows NTFS
There is no need to extend NFS as NFS v4 already supports extended attributes.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
